Friday, June 12, 2015

June 12 2015. I grew up in big houses full of fine furniture and even finer silver, china, and other valuables. But, things alone do not make a happy home.

REMINDERS OF THE HAPPIER TIMES OF MY CHILDHOOD

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

PHOTOGRAPHED IN THE BLUE DRAWING-ROOM OF OUR HOUSE IN AILESBURY ROAD, DUBLIN, IRELAND

ON THE LEFT, MY GRANDMOTHER, VIDA LENTAIGNE

IN THE CENTER, MY AUNT FANNY BRODIE

ONE THE RIGHT, HER SISTER, MY AUNT KITTY CAHILL

Actually, I’m not completely sure of the location because my mother created an almost identical room in the next house she moved to—which was Killarney Hill, Bray—which I loved (it was big and had 5 acres of land) but which my sister, Maxine, memorably described as a “house of evil.” She never explained why. I have some ideas on the matter. It is fairly safe to assume they had to do with sex. It was my mother’s main interest and yielded three husbands, numerous lovers, and 12 children. I was the eldest—a dubious privilege in some ways. Fun in others.

I associate the above three ladies with happiness because although I had a pretty miserable upbringing at home, and was sent to boarding school at the advanced age of five (which I hated) I loved staying with my grandmother (normally on her farm in the summer) and with my two aunts (collectively known as “The Fannies”) at Easter. They lived in Birr, County Offaly.

Sadly, I have very few photos of my grandmother. She was, as you can see, a very distinguished looking woman—and I absolutely adored her.

It was she who first introduced me to the world of books—and I have been in her debt ever since. She was a selfless woman who did more good in the world than anyone I have ever met.

She died in 1976 and I was heart-broken. I knew that life would never be the same—and it hasn’t been.

But, it’s a pretty good life for all that.

Thursday, June 11, 2015

June 11 2015. The world has a rest—but I’ve missed the action.

I HAVE BEEN OFF AIR FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

AND REALLY MISSED BLOGGING

The reasons were technical—and because I was too busy to take the necessary remedial action—and, frankly, I am not as technically competent as I would like to be (file that under massive understatement). Appreciate that I come from a generation where we still used dip pens (at school anyway). Deep down, I am probably still in culture shock.

Then, as is sometimes the way with computers, the problem vanished and, suddenly, I could upload to my website again. Somehow, I had a suspicion this might happen. I may have the computer literacy of a two year old, but I’m developing a certain affinity for the things. All it took was 30 years. I first started to use a computer seriously in 1986.

I understood the potential capabilities of computers very early on—but it has taken longer than I expected for things to work as I have long wished. They still don’t completely.

Will they ever?

I’m damned if I know.


Saturday, May 30, 2015

May 31 2015. I went to university far too you—I was 16—but it was still a particularly significant part of my life and I have always been glad I went where I did. All that history provides role models a-plenty.

STRANGE TO SEE MY OLD UNIVERSITY, TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN (FOUNDED BY ELIZABETH I) AS IT WAS C.1900 WHEN THE BRITISH STILL OCCUPIED IRELAND

College green dublin

STRANGER STILL TO SEE MEMBERS OF THE BRITISH BRIGADE OF GUARDS—IN FULL UNIFORM COMPLETE WITH BEARSKINS—IN THE FOREGROUND.

It takes a long time to get over being an occupied country. Ireland was first invaded by the British towards the end of the twelfth century—and did not succeed in driving them out until the early twentieth. That’s a long time to be occupied.

It then took a further three generations for Ireland to find its economic feet—and only a couple of decades before stumbling again.

As matters stand, Ireland appears to be recovering (I’ve had mixed reports). There are lies, damned lies, government statistics—and how people really live.

I guess I’ll have to find out for myself.


(#238-1) May 30 2015. It’s always a good idea to look at alternative ways of doing things—and particularly to look overseas. After all, we are competing with these guys—and, all too often—they are winning. Do they know something we don’t know?

IS THE AMERICAN BUSINESS MODEL THE ONLY WAYVICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

OR ARE THERE ALTERNATIVES?

ACTUALLY, THERE ARE—AND THEY ARE WORTH KNOWING ABOUT

The following is from that excellent website, http://toomuchonline.org/which illustrates quite how distorted the American Business Model has become.

A Manufacturer of Equality

JUNE 1, 2015 ⋅

In the United States, top corporate execs sometimes make more in an hour than their workers can make in a year. At Mondragon, one of Spain’s largest companies, no execs can make more in an hour than their workers make in a day.

No executives at the cooperatives that make up the Mondragon network, notes Mondragon International president Josu Ugarte, make more than six times the workers they manage.

At the Mondragon network, notes the cooperative’s international president Josu Ugarte, “we want to transform our society.”

Sky-high corporate CEO pay, the Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz notes in a new report, “creates social norms” that drive up levels of inequality far beyond corporate payrolls.

Those “social norms,” cheerleaders for our current corporate order insist, simply reflect economic reality. In a globalized world where corporations tally sales and profits in the many billions, their argument goes, no modern major business could possibly survive — let alone thrive — without shelling out top executive pay that stretches into the many millions.

The owners of one of the largest businesses in Spain would beg to disagree.

Their nearly 60-year-old enterprise — named Mondragon for the Basque town in northern Spain that gave it birth — has nearly 75,000 employees working in everything from heavy industry and retail to banking and education. A big-league business, in other words, by any metric.

Yet Mondragon doesn’t shell out millions to any of its top executives. No executive at Mondragon makes anything close to even a single million.

How could that be? Mondragon just happens to operate as a cooperative and may be, many analysts believe, the world’s most significant worker-owned business.

Josu Ugarte, the president of Mondragon International, spent a chunk of last month touring the United States, as part of the co-op’s ongoing outreach to people and groups looking for alternatives to corporate business as usual. What alternative for corporate compensation does Mondragon offer? Too Much editor Sam Pizzigati caught up with Ugarte in Washington, D.C. and explored that question with him.

Too Much: How long have you been with Mondragon?

Josu Ugarte: I’ve worked at Mondragon for 27 years ago, and I’ve been the president of Mondragon International, our global operation, for seven years.

No manager within a Mondragon co-op can make over six times the pay any worker in the co-op makes.

Too Much: How are manager-worker pay differentials determined within the various Mondragon cooperative enterprises?

Ugarte: We have limits in all our co-ops. No manager within any co-op can make more than six times the salary of any worker in the co-op.

We have another limit between co-ops, with the maximum difference between one co-op’s compensation and another’s at 38 percent.

Too Much: So the top executive at one Mondragon enterprise cannot make more than 38 percent more than the top executive at another coop?

Ugarte: Yes, the maximum difference could be 38 percent. But the maximum pay differential inside any individual co-op can be no more than one to six.

Too Much: The lowest-paid Mondragon associate in Spain is making about what?

Ugarte: About 28,000 euros [$32,000].

Too Much: Why do you all in Mondragon pay attention to the gap between top and bottom compensation?

Ugarte: Because at Mondragon we are the owners. Every associate is an owner of the company, and we consider a maximum acceptable pay difference one of our solidarity tools.

Mondragon considers its modest CEO-worker pay gap a tool for solidarity.

Too Much: And why is solidarity important? Here in the United States, no executives at General Motors or Microsoft would say that their enterprises value solidarity. Why does solidarity matter to you?

Ugarte: We are a cooperative. We are different. For us, people are our most important asset.

One of our most important newspapers in Spain, El Pais, just calculated the CEO-worker pay differential at the Spanish corporations listed in the IBEX 35, our stock market index. The difference between the highest and the lowest pay at these Spanish corporations averages 105 times. In our case, just six times.

Too Much: The latest figures place the differential at top U.S. companies at 374 to one.

Ugarte: Yes, enormous differences.

Too Much: So where do your executives come from? Are they people who come to their executive position from outside the Mondragon network or are they mostly people who come up through the Mondragon ranks?

Ugarte: Inside Mondragon, we give a lot of training for our people, and, unlike other companies, our hierarchical structure is very flat. We also keep information within Mondragon very transparent. All associates can access basic financial information about the company — because we are the owners.

In this environment, we get all our executives from inside. We promote from within. We have more than 100 Mondragon cooperative companies and over 240 associated entities, so we have a lot of opportunities in different companies to promote.

Too Much: People will go from one Mondragon enterprise to another?

Ugarte: We have many people moving inside Mondragon. I’ve moved between different companies. This helps managers at Mondragon understand our different sectors, from automotive and capital goods to construction and services and so on.

Within Mondragon, executives come from inside.

Too Much: Defenders of the current corporate order in the United States like to claim that you can’t effectively run a major modern business enterprise without paying top executives great gobs of compensation. At Mondragon, you clearly disagree.

Ugarte: We are not losing out for managerial talent because of our pay limits. For us, it is difficult to understand huge pay differences.

We had a Spanish basketball player in Madrid who went to the United States to play for the Portland Trailblazers. He actually lost money making the move. Es lo mismo, he explained, it’s all the same. To have lots of money and to have lots and lots of money, it’s all the same.

So the question is how much is enough? And this question becomes very locally relative, especially when you feel that the values and the solidarity of your organization give you a kind of wealth that doesn’t express itself in money.

Too Much: What sort of wealth?

Ugarte: We want to transform our society. We want to have a more equal society.

Researchers have a measure for inequality, the Gini Index. The higher the value between 0 and 1, the more unequal the society. The USA’s Gini sits around 0.5. Norway, the most equal society by the Gini Index, is at 0.22. Here in the Basque country, the base of Mondragon, we are at 0.24. So we are near the best society in terms of equality, and for us that is really important.

The home region of the Mondragon network ranks as one of the most equal locales in the world.

Too Much: Mondragon operates within a globalized world economy. What would happen if executives within Mondragon started arguing that your enterprise could no longer be globally competitive with a one-to-six pay gap?

Ugarte: To modify the gap would take a vote in the General Assembly, our cooperative’s congress. So it would not be easy to have the congress of Mondragon approving this kind of modification. This is an important issue. To make any change would require one and a half to two years of discussion.

But we think we are already globally competitive. We are following what we call a “multilocalization” strategy. We don’t “delocalize.” To delocalize is to take an asset from one country to another country, destroying employment in the origin country. We are not doing that.

We do invest abroad, especially in emerging markets. We have, for example, 18 factories in China. We have 122 factories abroad. Our companies that invest abroad, they increase their sales, they add value and employment at home.

We have compared our companies that invest abroad with the companies that stayed in the Basque country. Our multilocalized companies increased all their figures, and the companies that did not multilocalize lost employment at home. So we invite our companies to invest abroad in order to protect employment at home.

Too Much: In the factories that you run abroad, how do you handle compensation?

Ugarte: For the worker salaries, we pay higher than the local society norm. We always pay higher than the prevailing wage. And we offer for our companies abroad the possibility of organizing as a cooperative, but they haven’t wanted to choose that option yet.

Too Much: They don’t want cooperative status?

In hard times, all employees at Mondragon, including execs, sacrifice.

Ugarte: No, I think because to become a cooperativist, you need to make some tough decisions in tough times that may involve cutting the salaries or increasing the hours of fellow workers, including your own, when times demand it.

In the co-ops of Mondragon, if we are losing money, we decrease our salaries, our anticipation of results.

Too Much: And the salaries are reduced by your one to six ratio?

Ugarte: Yes, we always maintain this ratio.

Too Much: So if there is sacrifice, people at the top make sacrifices as well?

Ugarte: Yes, we want to be in for the long-term. We are all owners. As cooperativists, we all have capital, equity, in our company. This equity starts now with 15,000 euros we each put into the company to become an associate. The company allows you to pay this 15,000 over 24 months, taking out a little bit from each salary paycheck.

This equity grows over time, as our enterprises within Mondragon have profits. So we have, in effect, three kinds of income at Mondragon: our salaries, the growth in our equity in the company, and the interest Mondragon pays on that equity.

Too Much: When you look ahead five or ten years, where do you hope Mondragon will be? What do you hope to accomplish over that period?

sub-promo-interviewUgarte: I imagine Mondragon will be more international. I see Mondragon in a new complexity, where we’re trying to integrate people that we have abroad into our cooperative philosophy. That’s quite complicated because every culture is completely different.

But I think that all people want to participate. People want to have a lot of information about their company, about their future. So when we are going abroad, we bring with us our management model. When we are able to get that adopted universally, I think we will be stronger in the world and stronger at home.

Interested in more information about Mondragon? The co-op maintains a helpful English-language online presence full of useful background information.

Sam Pizzigati edits Too Much, the Institute for Policy Studies online monthly on excess and inequality. His latest book: The Rich Don’t Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class (Seven Stories Press).

- See more at: http://toomuchonline.org/this-business-manufactures-equality/#sthash.eqOcnPcR.dpuf


Friday, May 29, 2015

(#237-1) May 29 2015. What kind of America do Americans want? A money-driven, crony-driven, propaganda-driven, militarized, corporatized, polarized, privacy-free, big data dominated, socially controlled oppressive model is fast emerging—even while America grows more socially liberal.

I GREW UP WITH MOSTLY UNARMED, STRICTLY CIVILIAN, POLICE FORCES IN THE UK AND IRELAND

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

THIS LEVEL OF POLICE SHOOTINGS STRIKES ME AS DISTURBING—BUT I APPRECIATE MY ATTITUDES ARE EUROPEAN.

MORE WORRYING IS THE DEGREE TO WHICH POLICE SHOOTINGS ARE INADEQUATELY INVESTIGATED. THE POLICE CANNOT, ADEQUATELY, INVESTIGATE THEMSELVES.

A SURVEILLANCE STATE + MILITARIZED POLICE + THE HIGHEST RARE OF INCARCERATION IN THE WORLD + DAILY KILLINGS DAY BY POLICE—DOES NOT A DEMOCRACY MAKE. BUT IT IS FINE FOR A PLUTOCRACY (the current system)


Thursday, May 28, 2015

(#236-1) May 28 2015. One of the most dangerous places for an American to be is in an American hospital. And they also kill you financially.

DOES THE MEDICAL PROFESSION KNOW WHAT IT IS DOING?

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

MOST MEDICAL ADVICE IS NOT EVIDENCE BASED

MANY RESEARCH STUDIES ARE CARRIED OUT BY BIG PHARMA—AND ARE BIASED ACCORDINGLY

FEW DRUGS—LEGAL OR OTHERWISE—ARE TESTED IN COMBINATION

The following is from www.mercola.com

Beta-Blockers Killed 800,000 in 5 Years—“Good Medicine” or Mass Murder?

"Last summer, British researchers provoked concern when they published a paper raising the possibility that by following an established guideline UK doctors may have caused as many as 10,000 deaths each year,2"Larry Husten, editorial director of WebMD professional news, writes.

"Now, they have gone a step further and published an estimate that the same guideline may have led to the deaths of as many as 800,000 people in Europe over the last five years3...

The 800,000 deaths are comparable in size to the worst cases of genocide and mass murder in recent history."


Wednesday, May 27, 2015

#(235-1) May 27 2015. It is time to overhaul the constitution—but don’t hold your breath.

I WRITE REGULARLY THAT THE AMERICAN BUSINESS MODEL IS SERIOUSLY STRUCTURALLY FLAWED (IF IT WAS A HOUSE YOU WOULD HAVE TO EVACUATE IT UNTIL IT WAS FIXED)

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

SHEER GREED APART, THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS IS THAT THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM HAS BEEN HIJACKED. WELL, TO BE MORE PRECISE, IT HAS BEEN BOUGHT.

HERE IS MORE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THAT STATEMENT

The following is from http://www.upworthy.com/20-years-of-data-reveals-that-congress-doesnt-care-what-you-think

It confirms that the U.S. is no longer a working representative democracy. That comes as a shock to some people.

It really shouldn’t. It is painfully and blindingly obvious.

Professors Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin Page of Northwestern University looked at more than 20 years of data to answer a pretty simple question: Does the government represent the people?

Your opinion literally does not matter...

Their study took data from nearly 2,000 public-opinion surveys and compared what the people wanted to what the government actually did. What they found was extremely unsettling: The opinions of the bottom 90% of income earners in America has essentially no impact at all.

Put another way, and I'll just quote the Princeton study directly here:

“The preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy."

Really think about that for a second.

If you've ever felt like your opinion doesn't matter and that the government doesn't really care what you think, well … you're right.

But, of course, there's a catch.

...unless you're an "economic elite."

If there's one thing that still reliably gets politicians' attention, it's money. While the opinions of the bottom 90% of income earners in America have a "statistically non-significant impact," Gilens and Page found that economic elites, business interests, and people who can afford lobbyists still carry major influence.

How could it be that our government, designed to function as a representative democracy, is only good at representing such a small fraction of the population? Just follow the money.

Why? Because purchasing political influence is 100% legal.

For example: Let's say a big bank wants a law that would force taxpayers to bail them out again if they repeat the exact same reckless behavior that crashed the global economy in 2008.

It's perfectly legal for our bank to hire a team of lobbyists whose entire job is to make sure the government gives the bank what it wants. Then, those lobbyists can track down members of Congress who regulate banks and help raise a ton of money for their re-election campaigns. Its also perfectly legal for those lobbyists to offer those same politicians million-dollar jobs at their lobbying firms.

Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-Kansas), shown speaking at an event in 2012, recently attached language originally drafted by lobbyists for CitiGroup to a financial services appropriations bill. Members of Congress who voted "yes" on the bill received, on average, 2.8 times more money from the PACs of CitiGroup, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, and JPMorgan Chase than members who voted "no." Image by Information Technology Innovation Foundation/Flickr.

They can also literally write the language of this new bailout law themselves, then hand it off to the politicians they just buttered up with campaign money and lucrative job offers. And it's perfectly legal for those politicians to sneak the lobbyist-written language through Congress at the last second.

If that example sounds oddly specific, that's because it happened in December 2014. And it happens all the time, on almost every single issue, with politicians of both parties.

So is our Republic doomed? No.

Here's the good news: Every single practice outlined in this article can be made illegal by a simple statute — no constitutional amendment or overturning of Citizens United required. And there are thousands of people across the country fighting to make it happen right now.

The rebel alliance in action. Tallahassee voters approved the first municipal anti-corruption act in the U.S. by a 2-1 margin on Nov. 4, 2014. Image by Represent.Us.

My day job, for instance, is working with an organization called Represent.Us to pass state and local anti-corruption acts. We're one of many organizations fighting for reform and are working from the marriage equality and marijuana legalization playbook by using local wins to build momentum for national reform (you can learn a little more about the plan right here). It's working, too: The first municipal anti-corruption act in the U.S. has already passed, and more cities and two states are on their way in 2015 and 2016.

Looking for other reform organizations to get involved with? There's also Lawrence Lessig's MayDay PAC, a crowdfunded Super PAC to take down other Super PACs. And there's Take Back Our Republic: a conservative-leaning organization devoted to fighting corruption and cronyism. You could also get involved with EveryVoice. Or Common Cause. Or People for the American Way. Or Stamp Stampede. Or WolfPAC. Or Move to Amend. You've got options.

You can do something about it.

Big money in politics is emerging as a major issue in the 2016 election, and there are now dozens of organizations fighting hard for reform every day. If you're appalled by corruption, there's never been a better time to join the fight to stop it.