Friday, April 3, 2015

(#182-1) April 3 2015. Snakes & Ladders. Which are you on?

DAY AFTER DAY THE FIGURES ROLL IN. THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR.

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

THE CURRENT AMERICAN BUSINESS MODEL ISN’T DELIVERING AS FAR AS MOST AMERICANS ARE CONCERNED. MEANWHILE THE RICH GET EVER RICHER.

The following is from that excellent magazine www.businessweek.com

Americans Watched Their Incomes Shrink, Except For the Highest-Earners

It's the latest sign of income inequality in the country

Americans are earning less than they did in 2013, with one notable exception: the rich.

Average incomes before taxes fell for a second year in the year ended July 2014, down 0.9 percent, while expenditures were up 1 percent on average, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics mid-year consumer expenditures update, released Thursday.

Only the top 20 percent of American earners experienced income growth in that time period, swelling 0.9 percent. Their annual pre-tax income increased to $166,048. Meanwhile, every other income group shed 2 percent or more. The lowest quintile, which earned $9,818 on average, lost the most ground.

The lowest-earners also increased their spending by the most, boosting their expenditures by 2.9 percent, to $22,981 on average. The bulk of those outlays (41 percent) went to housing.

The data offer the latest signs of the growing chasm between America's rich and poor. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen has used her first year as Fed chief to advocate for those hurt most by the deepest recession since the Great Depression.

As central bank policy makers prepare to possibly raise interest rates for the first time since June 2006, Yellen told a Boston Fed conference on inequality in October that she’s “greatly” concerned by a sustained rise in U.S. income and wealth inequality.


Thursday, April 2, 2015

(#181-1) April 2015. To hell with being scared. It is time to act. But are we too scared to act—or too ignorant?

THE CURRENT AMERICAN BUSINESS MODEL IS NOT SERVING THIS NATION WELL—AND IT SHOWS

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW DISASTROUS IT IS:

MORE CLOSINGS THAN STARTUPS

GREY = NEW BUSINESSES

RED = BUSINESS CLOSINGS

1980s TO CURRENT

From NYT April 1 2015 by Thomas B. Edsall

Over the past three decades, the American economy has become less vigorous. An extensive body of evidence shows that the public focus on the success of high-tech companies like Apple and Google masks an overall downward trend in key measures of business vitality.

“Business deaths now exceed business births for the first time in the thirty-plus year history of our data,” note Ian Hathaway and Robert E. Litan, economists at the Brookings Institution, in a May 2014 essay, “Declining Business Dynamism in the United States.”

There is widespread support for their assertion. Jim Clifton, chairman and C.E.O. of Gallup, wrote in a January 2015 essay, “American Entrepreneurship: Dead or Alive?”:

Until 2008, start-ups outpaced business failures by about 100,000 a year. But in the past six years, that number has suddenly turned upside down. There has been an underground earthquake.

I seem to be running into more and more frightened people these days—and frightened people do not behave well. The solutions are straightforward, but are blocked by the Right Wing (Republicans)  who simply do not want to govern (and aren’t very good at it when they try).  

They are also blocked by the Left Wing (Democrats) who have become so addicted to being funded by Big Business (particularly the financial sector) that they are are very reluctant to do anything which might threaten that cozy situation. In fact, they refuse to discuss the failings of the American Business Model with the clarity required. They more nibble around the edges.

What do the Democrats stand for? I’m damned if I know.

The people who are closest to getting to grips with the issues are the Progressives—who are more or less (open to debate) a subset of the Democrats. By and large, they have good policies—somewhat akin to those of European Social Democrats—but, so far, have not succeeded in resonating adequately with the American public.

One exception is Senator Elizabeth Warren—an extremely effective and articulate woman—whose main problem is that she suffers from that most serious of American maladies, lack of name recognition.

It is my belief that Americans, despite being seriously uninformed about the economic forces at work—not entirely surprising given who owns and controls the media—are far more frightened than either the media, or people in general, are prepared to admit.

Of course we don’t admit to being scared out of our minds. Our self image is of relentlessly optimistic rugged individuals—entirely indifferent to facts—but guided by ‘gut feel.’

Most Americans have good reason to be afraid. Many of the assumptions that have underpinned the American Way of Life have proved to be no more than myths, the current American Business Model is corrupt, predatory, and clearly not delivering, and the trend lines are ominous.

A good friend of mine argues that the U.S., right now, is in a state of ‘moral panic.’

Wikipedia defines ‘moral panic’ as:

an intense feeling expressed in a population about an issue that appears to threaten the social order.[1]Moral panics are in essence controversies that involve arguments and social tension, and in which agreement is difficult because the matter at its centre is taboo.[2] The media are key players in the dissemination of moral indignation, even when they do not appear to be consciously engaged in crusading or muckraking. Simply reporting the facts can be enough to generate concern, anxiety or panic.[3]

I like the phrase, though I’m not entirely happy with the definition. But, one characteristic is that people’s behavior deteriorates when in such a state—as it does when the word ‘panic’ alone is considered adequate to describe the situation.

Is our behavior deteriorating—particularly within economic parameters?

It seems self-evident that it is—and the increasing lack of trust in almost everything except the military (about which most Americans know impressively little) suggests that most Americans know it.

The next stage, if we were a Latin American Banana Republic (one of those countries exploited by a few ultra-rich people, without a middle class, and with most people poor—which the U.S. regards with some contempt) would suggest a coup might be in order.

That is unlikely to happen—because it already has. The ultra-rich have the controls—the rest of us are locked out—and they are flying us straight into a mountain.

The good news? It is an American mountain. This is an exercise in self-destruction.

Who knew that ending up owning all the marbles would be so depressing?

VOR words c.400.


 

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

(#180-1) April 1 2015. Battle of the brain—and it’s my brain I’m battling with.

I MAY BE THE WORLD’S WORST MULTI-TASKER

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

I’M A WRITER—AND WRITING, AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED, IS ABOUT FOCUS.

IT HAS TAKEN ME A LONG TIME TO GET TO THIS STAGE, (where I can get into the focus-on-writing zone on demand)

BUT NOW I DO THAT WELL.

I have got great faith in brainpower (though rather less in human nature).  But, it is my experience, that if you apply your brain and focus, you can normally find a solution to most of the issues that one encounters in life.

I’m not so naïve as to say that you can implement them—because all sorts of alternative agendas, not to mention fear, greed, suspicion, and ignorance—tend to block even the most rational and well thought-out solutions. Nonetheless, I am much comforted by the thought that solutions are not only possible, but much more widely available than many of my more fatalistic brethren seem to think.

To use a phrase I return to so often it seems to be damn nearly my mantra: The answers are out there if only you are prepared to look.

But, here is the kicker. Looking requires focus (almost a social sin these days). We seem to prefer juggling many problems rather than resolving one (at a time).

Yes, there are such things as ‘wicked problems’—to use a technical term which I rather enjoy (check it out in Wikipedia) but they are the exception rather than the rule.

Inability or unwillingness to focus strikes me  as a prevailing weakness of our society. Perhaps because focusing requires considerable effort, and our potential distractions are so many, we seem to be evolving a society where it is almost becoming culturally unacceptable not to multitask—and where refusing to really take the time to understand an issue is regarded as reasonable. After all, thinking takes time and effort and we are busy, busy, busy. Besides, we have gut instinct to rely upon.

Instead, we skate, we skim, we hop, we trivialize —and we feel proud of ourselves because we are multitasking.

I have to wonder whether multitasking isn’t another name for intellectual laziness. But, I will freely confess that I am biased—and not just because, as a writer, I need to focus. It is also because I suffer from a form of dyslexia which means that, innately, I don’t handle multi-tasking well. You could argue that, in some ways, my mind is downright slow (which, however true, doesn’t make my ego happy) though, paradoxically, I’m quite quick witted.

But, whatever about my limitations, I am greatly concerned at the way multitasking has become so much part of our way of life. It seems to me it is making us dumber.

An excellent piece by Travis Bradberry in Entrepreneur of March 27 2015 suggests that I may have a point.

Multitasking Can Damage Your Brain and Career, Studies Say

You’ve likely heard that multitasking is problematic, but new studies show that it kills your performance and may even damage your brain. Research conducted at Stanford University found that multitasking is less productive than doing a single thing at a time. The researchers found that people who are regularly bombarded with several streams of electronic information cannot pay attention, recall information, or switch from one job to another as well as those who complete one task at a time.

 

A Special Skill?

But what if some people have a special gift for multitasking? The Stanford researchers compared groups of people based on their tendency to multitask and their belief that it helps their performance. They found that heavy multitaskers—those who multitask a lot and feel that it boosts their performance—were actually worse at multitasking than those who like to do a single thing at a time. The frequent multitaskers performed worse because they had more trouble organizing their thoughts and filtering out irrelevant information, and they were slower at switching from one task to another. Ouch. Multitasking reduces your efficiency and performance because your brain can only focus on one thing at a time. When you try to do two things at once, your brain lacks the capacity to perform both tasks successfully.

Multitasking Lowers IQ

Research also shows that, in addition to slowing you down, multitasking lowers your IQ. A study at the University of London found that participants who multitasked during cognitive tasks experienced IQ score declines that were similar to what they’d expect if they had smoked marijuana or stayed up all night. IQ drops of 15 points for multitasking men lowered their scores to the average range of an 8-year-old child. So the next time you’re writing your boss an email during a meeting, remember that your cognitive capacity is being diminished to the point that you might as well let an 8-year-old write it for you.

Brain Damage From Multitasking

It was long believed that cognitive impairment from multitasking was temporary, but new research suggests otherwise. Researchers at the University of Sussex in the UK compared the amount of time people spend on multiple devices (such as texting while watching TV) to MRI scans of their brains. They found that high multitaskers had less brain density in the anterior cingulate cortex, a region responsible for empathy as well as cognitive and emotional control.

While more research is needed to determine if multitasking is physically damaging the brain (versus existing brain damage that predisposes people to multitask), it’s clear that multitasking has negative effects. Neuroscientist Kep Kee Loh, the study’s lead author, explained the implications: “I feel that it is important to create an awareness that the way we are interacting with the devices might be changing the way we think and these changes might be occurring at the level of brain structure.”

VOR words 423.


Tuesday, March 31, 2015

(#179-1) March 31 2015. Bull in a China shop—though we seem to have started in the Middle East.

AN INFORMED OPINION—NO MORE

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

U.S. ACTIONS OVER THE DECADES ARE GOING TO RESULT INEXORABLY IN A NUCLEAR CONSEQUENCE (probably asymmetric)..

WE HAVE NOW MEDDLED SO MUCH IN THE MIDDLE EAST (and most of the rest of the world)—WITHOUT THOUGHT, SKILL, OR COMPASSION THAT THE END RESULT IS BOTH PREDICTABLE AND INEVITABLE.

IT WILL HAPPEN RELATIVELY SOON—AND WILL BE MULTIPLE

CAN IT BE STOPPED?

PROBABLY NOT

Clearly, I don’t know whether there will be a nuclear attack on the U.S. or not. I am not privy to any classified defense information—and I’m not privy to any terrorist plans (except through deduction and where they have stated their objectives publicly).

I am widely read, traveled, and experienced—and follow MANS closely—and have for about 60 years—but there it ends. Does that make me an expert? I’ll leave that to others to decide. I do know I’m deeply knowledgeable about this murky world and have become fairly good at determining patterns and trends. In this regard, it helps greatly to know history and context—and to have a mind that thinks holistically. You need to be able to make connections that are less than obvious. That said, merely recognizing the predictable would be an encouraging start.

Do U.S. policy makers? I’m not sure they care.

Why on earth did we think we could invade and occupy Iraq with impunity—and then behave in the way we did? Why do we continue to kill, destroy, and otherwise meddle in scores of other countries?

There is a difference between being strong enough to deter aggression—and being wantonly reckless.

What is MANS? It stands for ‘Military and National Security’ and is how I index the information I gather for that category every day. I like to maintain what I think of as a ‘base of information’ and then research further if necessary. I focus on:

  • MANS
  • ECON (Economics and The Economy)
  • P&D (Politics and Democracy)
  • TECH (Technology)
  • INNOVATION

What has caused me to fly this particular kite is a sense that the militarization of U.S. foreign policy has got completely out of control—and seems to be increasingly counterproductive. Nonetheless, the American people as a whole—as with so many issues—don’t seem to question what is going on.

If you examine U.S. foreign policy since WW II—after a very encouraging start which included the Marshall Plan, it is hard not to conclude that we have been as much part of the problem as part of the solution—and maybe most of the problem in all too many cases.

This is such a consistent pattern that one has to conclude it is not an accident. But who benefits?

The short answer is that the MICC (Military Industrial Congressional Complex) benefits greatly—and has done so for a staggering three-quarters of a century ever since the U.S. started to re-arm around the beginning of WW II.

Big Oil and Big Business in general have also done exceedingly well.

The American people, as a whole, have done very badly out of militarization. Trillions of dollars, which could have been spent to improve our quality of life, have instead been spent—nominally anyway—on security in some way or another.

Are we safer as a consequence?

I believe to the contrary. In particular, our behavior since 9/11 has been almost entirely counter-productive to the point where we have managed to de-stabilize virtually the entire Islamic world, and to push large numbers to the classic extremist behavior that stems from desperation.

There is always a reason for terrorism—and, primarily it stems from desperation. Desperate people do desperate things and since they know perfectly well that the U.S. is too large and powerful to be seriously affected by conventional terrorist bombs, it seems inevitable that they will turn to nuclear weaponry.

Will they be able to lay their hands on it?

I believe they will—and that they are sufficiently motivated to smuggle nuclear devices into the U.S. and to detonate them. I believe multiple weapons will be involved.

But, I’m a thriller writer so I would think this way, wouldn’t I?

Being a thriller writer does not make me wrong—and it certainly encourages me to think about various possible scenarios. A consistent theme, as far as I am concerned, is that nuclear weapons will be used again. I regard that as inevitable.

By the way, the country that worries me most is not Iran, but Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden and most of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi. They are a dictatorship ruling over a truly worrying number of extremists. They have money to burn. They are frightened. We have sold them a ridiculous quantity of high-tech weaponry. And they are currently attacking Yemen.

Do they have nuclear weapons—or access to them? They have more than enough money to buy access—and they are motivated. I suspect they do. 

VOR words 803.


Sunday, March 29, 2015

#178-1 March 30 2015. The lure of words.

IF BOOK WRITING —GENERALLY SPEAKING—FAILS TO OFFER FAME, FORTUNE, OR SECURITY

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

WHEREIN LIES ITS APPEAL?

IT IS MY LIFE

I have stressed the downside of writing at such length—particularly in yesterday’s blog—that I woke, today, with a feeling that I should write something about the positive effects of book writing. I’m less concerned with redressing the balance than in clarifying my own ideas insofar as I can.

Given the disadvantages I have listed, surely there has to be an up-side?

Or am I insane

That is not as easy as it sound because I don’t really know with certainty why I love writing so much. Mostly, I accept the reality, give thanks, and go on from there. Where writing is concerned, I don’t spend much time being introspective about it.

I prefer to actually write. The reward lies in the doing.

Today, I’m going to try to be introspective and  write.  My main fear is that I won’t convey the pleasure of writing adequately. It is one of these things—like jumping out of a perfectly good aircraft—that you really have to do to understand.

Writing bears a certain resemblance to such an activity—without a parachute!

I can’t adequately justify it—but I love it so!

  • CHEMISTRY. As with being in love (or lust), there is a great deal you can’t explain. You click with some people, but not with others. Writing was an imperative initially—as far as I was concerned—but a particularly troublesome mistress. I struggled. Over time I have fallen deeply in love and remain in that state. I continue to struggle—writing is never easy—but it has exceeded all my expectations by far—and continues to surprise and delight me. I am intrigued by it, passionate about it—and (somewhat to my surprise) faithful to it.
  • CREATIVITY DEMANDS AN OUTLET. If you have an active, restless, intellectually curious mind, you feel you will virtually explode if  don’t find an outlet. Writing, at least partially, resolves this issue. I say ‘partially,’ because unwritten stories creative their own pressure. But it is much better to have such ideas than not.
  • IF YOU LOVE READING, WRITING IS A LOGICAL EXTENSION. Reading saved me from a particularly miserable early childhood—which included violence at home, and much bullying, and  over a decade at boarding school—and represented escape and adventure. While I read, I was content—and I read all the time and virtually anywhere.
  • PEOPLE NATURALLY GRAVITATE TOWARDS WHAT THEY ARE GOOD AT.  I don’t recall displaying any talent for anything much while I was at my Irish boarding school—from the age of five to nine—except that I survived. Strangely enough, the academic side, once I learned to read, is a complete blank. I remember some of the teachers and the bullying—but not a single class. I must have had school reports but I can recall nothing about them. I have no idea whether I did well or badly. All I know is that at the age of nine I was removed from St. Gerard’s—which was based in Ireland—and send to Gilling Castle, the prep school belonging to the highly regarded Catholic public school, Ampleforth College. There, I quickly excelled—particularly in anything which involved writing. I fact, I ended up as the academic top of the school when I was twelve and moved on to Ampleforth’s middle school which was known as Junior House. Well, this isn’t the place for a detailed school history, but the point is that I showed an aptitude for writing at that early age. In fact, I wasn’t a bad poet back then—though it was prose that attracted me. Why didn’t I become a writer after I graduated from university?
    • I felt I didn’t have enough experience of life.
    • I wasn’t a good enough writer.
    • The few writing jobs that were available paid badly.
    • I didn’t have a mentor or any real connection to that world—and had no idea where to start.
    • I wasn’t sure, at the time, that it was a realistic possibility.
    • I was under great pressure from my mother to get a well paid job in business.

Despite all these factors, while still in my late twenties, in the end I gave up a well paid job in business in order to write. By any practical standards, it was an insane decision—because I went from relative financial security and comfort to a life of uncertainty—but it was the right decision for me.

  • WRITING IS TAILOR-MADE TO LEAD TO ADVENTURES & EXTRAORDINARY PEOPLE. IT IS NEAR THE ULTIMATE DOOR OPENER. Subject to your finances and publishing arrangements, it is really up to you, the writer, to determine where and how you do your research, how long you will spend upon it, who you shall meet, and what you shall do. As a consequence, if you are prepared to exercise initiative, you will end up doing remarkable things and meeting extraordinary people. My kind of writing doesn’t guarantee it. But it makes it possible.
  • WRITING CAN RESULT IN EXTRAORDINARY ACCESS. Such access is not guaranteed. It depends what you write and how you handle yourself—but it has worked this way as far as I have been concerned.
  • WRITING GIVES YOU A VEHICLE FROM WHICH TO INVESTIGATE JUST ABOUT ANYTHING. Theoretically, anyone can investigate anything but, it is much easier to this if you have the cover of being a writer. Writers are expected to ask questions. Plumbers, for instance, are not (except about plumbing).
  • WRITING ALLOWS YOU TO OPERATE WITHOUT THE NORMAL CONSTRAINTS OF A JOB—THOUGH AT THE PRICE OF SECURITY. Some may regard this a somewhat Faustian bargain. All I can say is that I regard getting though most of my adult life without having to adhere to the normal constraints and disciplines of a regular job as worth the price. Then, there is also the fact that job security is no longer what it was.
  • WRITING ALLOWS A TRULY REMARKABLE DEGREE OF INDEPENDENCE. It is in the nature of life that one is strongly influenced—to the point of being conditioned—by one’s surroundings. When you are dependent upon an employer, this is hard to resist. I have largely been able to resist this situation.
  • WRITING  IS EXTRAORDINARILY THERAPEUTIC. When I started to write seriously, I found I couldn’t. First, I had to train my mind. Later, riddled with self-doubt as I was, I found it more struggle than anything else. More recently—though I still find it hard work—I regard the whole process as a privilege, a pleasure, and quite remarkably relaxing.
  • WRITING YIELDS SIGNIFICANT HEALTH BENEFITS—AS FAR AS THE MIND IS CONCERNED. Writing involves constant exercise for one’s brain—with proportionate benefits. Whether writing is entirely good for you physically is another matter. Sitting at a computer all day is now known to be harmful. I’m trying to transition to being a writer who potters a lot.
  • WRITING CAN COMMAND CONSIDERABLE RESPECT. Though I have stressed that more than a few people neither understand nor respect writers—unless the writer is clearly enjoying some degree of fame and financial success, others do respect the talent and commitment involved—and they are more likely to be the people you want to respect you in the first place. Personally, I have found the best door-opener to be a book. If I give someone a book the chances are the next time I meet them they will have become a friend.
  • WRITING FEELS LIKE THE RIGHT THING FOR ME TO BE DOING. I guess most of us question our purpose in life at some stage or other. When things are tough, it is natural to wonder whether one shouldn’t be in another line of work. No matter how things are, I always come to the same conclusion. I’m doing what I am meant to be doing.
  • WRITING CAN AND DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE. I don’t want to overstress either the importance or significance of what my written words have accomplished over the decades. All I can say is that my words have made a difference in some rather serious ways  in addition to helping some millions of people relax with one of my thrillers. I’m content with that—plus a little bit more I still intend to do.
  • WRITING IS EXHILERATING. IT OFFERS A REMARKABLE DEGREE OF SUSTAINED INTELLECTUAL SATISFACTION. THE SHEER EFFORT RESULTS IN A ‘WRITER’S HIGH.’ It is a great thing to feel so good while working day after day after day—despite the inevitable stresses of life. As I have written before, it is a joyous feeling—and it endures.

Do all book writers feel this way? I doubt we do. We are a mixed bunch. Nonetheless, most of the writers I know personally love what we do and would be of this mind.

“We few, we happy few, we band of writers.”

With all due acknowledgement to William Shakespeare—who was very much one of us.

VOR words 1,474.


 

(#177-1) March 29 2015 Every writer needs a friend. Read on and you will see why.

IT HAS REQUIRED QUITE ASTONISHING EFFORT, ENDURANCE, AND FORTITUDE TO BECOME AND REMAIN A WRITER.  IT STILL DOES.

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

HAS IT BEEN WORTH IT? IS IT STILL WORTH IT?

Life, as far as a writer is concerned, is all material. Every thought and every experience—whether good or bad, and no matter how intimate—is evaluated, consciously or subconsciously, as to its possible relevance to the written word.

A writer never stops working. Whether you are sitting at your desk actually writing—or lying in the sun on the Costa Del Sol  (Spain) glass of wine at one hand, near naked companion touching the other (people do actually take vacations in Europe)—you think writing.

When you are asleep, your subconscious makes its own essential contribution.

And the damn thing works without pay!

Writing is an evolutionary process. It starts with gathering information in any and every way possible. The inevitably confusing and chaotic consequence of all this input tends to be compounded by the fact that the creative mind tends to be both questioning and restless to the point of exhaustion. It refuses to accept the incoming data on face value.  It examines, queries, debates, prioritizes, changes—and, above all, struggles. It eschews the obvious and the predictable. It experiments with unorthodox associations. It rejects and re-examines. And the whole stress-inducing business takes as long as it takes. The truly creative mind has a strange sense of time and scant regard for deadlines.  Yet, from such anarchy stems insight and clarity—or such is the goal.

Writing is the conversion of thought into the written word—a deceptively simple process when described—but agonizingly difficult to do well because you have also got to engage, entertain, and convince the reader—and keep doing it for hundreds of pages. Then, there is the modest matter of having thoughts of some value in the first place. That takes an original cast of mind—and more work than most can imagine.

A principle of life is that the simpler it looks, the harder it almost certainly is to do. What looks effortless invariably takes practice, experience, and sustained effort.

Clear, entertaining, and compelling writing requires formidable commitment.—and the persistence of Sisyphus. The professional writer is a driven talent. Such people have to be.

Today, you are not just competing with other writers in unprecedented quantities, but with more distractions than have ever existed throughout history—everything from TV to phone apps—and many free at that, and, where smart phones are concerned, constantly at hand.

Hemingway put it well. “There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed.”

Bleeding is no longer enough. Hemingway lived and wrote in a simpler time when a writer’s primary preoccupation was the writing itself. Today, a writer  has to be concerned with a wide range of activities from cover design to marketing to the ever changing complexities of social media.

The process of writing alone can be agonizing—and break your heart, your hopes, and your spirit. It can be humiliating. Add in the other areas a writer has to be concerned with, and the totality of effort required becomes formidable in the extreme. It is relentlessly demanding.

Writing, in my case, isn’t a job. It’s a total commitment. It’s a way of thinking, and life, which influences my every conscious action to a degree many would find surprising—and probably unacceptable.

They would regard the price as being too high—far too high. Awful!

They have my sympathy. It probably is too high by most standards. A self-employed book writer like me faces:

  • FAILURE. Chronic failure across the spectrum including being unable to write quite as well as one wants. A writer, no matter how successful, lives with failure because such creative endeavor is a search for perfection—an innately unachievable goal. It requires a particular kind of personality to live with that.
  • YEARS OF LEARNING. Years, and then decades, spent learning one’s craft. It’s important to keep learning and to appreciate that breakthroughs come from pushing the envelope—and sometimes doing something you dislike. I loathed blogging but was encouraged to continue. I did—and it has had a profoundly constructive effect upon my writing. Now, I love it.
  • LOST TIME. Denial of opportunity—particularly where time is concerned. Writing is time-consuming to a degree that most people don’t understand. As a consequence, a writer has to make hard choices which can be seen by others as being selfish. There is no alternative because time is finite. Creativity is not about compromise. It is about focus in pursuit of a result. Such zeal can be misinterpreted as cruelty. It isn’t. It is necessary.
  • WORKING EXTRAORDINARILY HARD. Between research and writing, I put in more than 80 hours a week. I cannot say that is what every writer does, but I can say that most I know would regard a normal 40 hour week as being close to decadent. Mind you, we writers aren’t against a little decadence every now and then.
  • LOSS OF PRIVACY. Most of us construct a carapace and conceal our doubts, imperfections, and fears behind it. Doubtless, we writers do the same thing—but then we reveal ourselves at length through our writing.
  • SELF-DOUBT & STRESS. Chronic self-doubt and stress. Your self-doubt is not confined to your writing—where being self-critical is essential if you are to improve. But you also question your way of life because it is a ridiculously difficult and impractical path to choose. There are many easier ways to make a more financially rewarding living.  
  • REJECTION. Rejection—again and again. Rejection pervades the book business and even the most successful authors have normally been rejected multiple times. A writer faces rejection by agents, publishers, critics, family, friends, and most of the rest of the human race. Your best friend may end up being your cat. The worst fate of all is to be rejected by one’s readers.
  • THE LOW PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS. The high probability of total failure. Very few of us earn enough to make a living from writing, and only a small elite group become consistently Best Selling Authors. And, in their cases, it is all too easy to become the prisoner of a genre—even though you crave to write something else. Being in a creative prison—even if you are wealthy—is soul-destroying. A tip—if you are going to have your soul destroyed, it is more endurable if you are wealthy.
  • FINANCIAL INSECURITY. Chronic financial insecurity. This is normally enough to break most of us just by itself. More than a few writers live in poverty.
  • IGNORANCE. A lack of understanding by the majority. In my experience, most people are deeply and profoundly ignorant about writing as a way of life. Since most of us know how to write—albeit to a minimal standard—that statement is somewhat counter-intuitive, but the point to grasp is not that they don’t understand the mechanics of the process, but that a writer’s mindset doesn’t resonate with them. We think differently. If they knew how differently, they would run!
  • SOCIAL UNACCEPTABILITY. Being regarded as something of a failure and socially unacceptable by many. People tend to evaluate you by how much money you make (and who you work for—prestige by association)—and most writers just don’t make that much money. The more perceptive don’t particularly like the fact that writers are in the judgment business (as in wondering whether a person can be utilized in writing in any way). That can be regarded as closer evaluation than is socially comfortable. To make it worse, writers tend to be unusually observant and empathetic—so little escapes our notice. But, we tend to be hardest of all on ourselves.
  • LACK OF SUPPORT. A lack of support by your nearest and dearest. If you are not a good breadwinner—and most writers are not—people’s faith in you has a habit of evaporating. Love can meet the same fate.  
  • CRITICISM. Editorial criticism. A good editor can be enormously helpful, but they are rare and over-worked. The corporatization and consolidation of traditional publishing has meant that there are now many fewer editors than there were—and they have markedly less time to work with an author. As to the quality of editors, the odds are against being hooked up with a good one. Working with an editor you are not compatible with can be a soul-destroying experience. I have been there. It is.
  • AGENT & PUBLISHER EXPLOITATION & DISHONESTY. Frequent truly bad advice and exploitation by both agents  and publishers. It seems to be generally assumed that a writer will be well advised by both agent and publisher. What they don’t understand is that the writer, agent and publisher have very different agendas. The writer is creative. The agent and publisher are sales people—middlemen who make a living by exploiting the talents of the creative.  You can argue that such exploiters perform necessary functions in the process—especially because many writers are temperamentally unsuited to perform the commercial aspects of the process. Nonetheless, as a consequence, the writer may well be be lied to and otherwise deceived to a degree that is hard to credit. In my experience, the best advice comes from only one source—other writers.
  • LONELINESS. Most of us both enjoy and require a high level of social interaction. In contrast, most book writers work alone in order to focus. Such solitude can be both depressing and soul destroying. In my case, I don’t find it so because my characters are real to me when I write—and I find writing generally is so fulfilling. But the potential for social alienation is there.
  • MARKETING NEGLECT. Being badly marketed by publishers. It is a terrible thing to work for years on a book and then have it die because no one knows that it exists. Most books are merely distributed and not marketed at all. Readers stumble across them—if you are lucky.
  • BAD REVIEWS. Public criticism in the form of really bad reviews. Such criticism may well not be justified. Nonetheless, these hurt your sales, your finances, and your pride.
  • DESPAIR. A writer will be tempted to despair more often than I care to describe. You have to endure regardless. The qualities a writer requires—apart from writing talents—are somewhat paradoxical. It helps your actual writing greatly if you are emotionally sensitive and empathetic—which almost certainly makes you vulnerable—but you also need to be mentally tough and resilient, or the life will kill you. In short, you need to be simpatico, but stoic—sensitive, but have stamina—reasonable, but robust. Writing is a true test of character.

Have I experienced any of the above? Pretty much all of the above to some degree or other—though I haven’t been rejected by my readers.

That is a rather fundamental qualification. If your readers want you, you can survive just about anything. Better yet if they write to you—as mine have in their thousands.

But, the price, as far as I am concerned, has never been relevant. I didn’t just want to be a writer. I knew I had to be a writer if ever I was to have any peace of mind at all. It was an imperative I cannot explain.

I don’t think there was one specific moment when I made that commitment. It was more that I made a series of decisions over time—years and then decades—which have resulted in my current level of dedication.

I now realize that just about every action I take—from what I think about—to what I eat—is influenced by its relevance to writing. The issue is not whether I am right or wrong in that regard. It is just the way it is.

Do I think about the price I have paid—and continue to pay—for being a writer? Yes, I do—and relatively often. Virtually all my friends are financially secure, if not downright wealthy, and are able to do things which—in my current state—I cannot afford to do. Many are retired. I face having to work until I die.

That’s as lucky as it gets in my case. What else would I want to do!

Perhaps the most frustrating thing has been finding that I am almost completely unable to explain writing—and specifically my particular approach to it—to a non-writer (subject to rare and wonderful exceptions).

Yes, people understand the appeal of not have a regular job, of not being subject to the whims of a boss, of being able to travel anywhere (if you can afford it) and being empowered to ask anybody anything—but they can’t come close to grasping the appeal of writing itself—and that all the other aspects, from the research to the adventures you can have, are peripheral to the challenge of building a creation out of the written word.

On the contrary, they regard writing as hard work, and often near impossible—so something to be avoided.

Why would any sane normal person want to do it—especially all day and alone at that?

On the other hand, perversely, most people seem to think they could write a book if only they had the time. The unstated implication is that it would be a good book at that.

No matter how they talk, few people start writing a book. Fewer people still finish writing one. Very, very, few write a good book.

This is no reflection on them—or on you. I am merely making the point that most of us—whatever our skills and strengths—are not writers; and that to write a book of merit requires a great deal more than having led an interesting life, or having a few good ideas.

Now that Amazon (and others) have made independent publishing both respectable and often successful (if you put the effort in) that still means there are an awful lot of books out there—but that number still pales in relation to the size of population. Hundreds of thousands of books are published annual these days—which can seem overwhelming—but the global population is in excess of seven billion.

The issue of time is an interesting one. Many people have a regular job and write in the evenings or when they can (which is rarely as often or as long as they would like.

I decided fairly early on that if I was to become the kind of writer I aspired to be, I would need to work at it full time—or as close to that as possible. I would, if necessary, take time off to do a consulting job to avoid starvation, but I would be as near full-time as I could. There were several reasons for this.

  • I thought it would take considerable time for me merely to learn how to write a book—let alone to do the deed itself. I started without any book-writing experience at all. I hadn’t even done much journalism. I was proven to be right on both counts.
  • I have noticed that regular paid employment can have a corrosive effect. It is very hard to retain your creativity when you have to conform to the customs and practices of an organization—no matter its quality--and I loathe commuting.  
  • If you have a regular job—and family responsibilities—it is actually quite hard to find the time to write. That book you want to write never gets finished.
  • I work best when I’m fully focused. I am a terrible multi-tasker.
  • I wanted time to read and think as well as write—and reading in itself—at least as much as I do—is time consuming..
  • A close friend of mine, Niall Fallon, a truly wonderful man (sadly now dead prematurely of a heart attack), also a writer but with a full time job as a deputy editor of The Irish Times, advised me strongly to commit totally to writing. His job required only four days a week, but he still found it very hard to write part-time. In contrast, he had taken a year off earlier to write a book and had found that worked much better. He stressed the importance and value of total commitment.

I did just that—and then steadily increased my focus on it to the point where—even if I want to relax—I write. I do other things too, of course—like walk or have dinner with friends—and I love movies—but writing is the focus of my life.

Has the sacrifice—and all the other difficulties—been  worth it?

Totally.

I wish I could think of a stronger word—but I guess ‘totally’ is as unequivocal as it gets.

In fact, even in my worse moments, I have never had any regrets about becoming  a writer. I regret some of the other decisions I have made—and particularly my lack of courage on various occasions, or how I have behaved (sometimes) where interpersonal relations have been concerned—but I have never had any reservations about becoming a writer. On the contrary, I occasionally breakout in a mental sweat when I consider what life might have been like if I had not become a writer. I shudder!

I rarely feel envy in any real sense these days—and certainly not about material possessions, social position, nor status.

There is no mystery as to the reason.

I have my problems—and some are difficult—but, in essence, I’m  doing what I most want to do in the world (or something related to it) all day—and well into most evenings—for nearly every day. I’m motivated, inspired, energized—and creatively, intellectually, and emotionally, fulfilled to a level that I didn’t believe was possible.

I don’t want anything in a fundamental sense I haven’t got. I would like to do more for those I love—and change the world for the better. But I feel beyond privileged to be a writer.

As for my angst—maybe that is what a writer needs to keep him (or her) going.

Regarding my comment about every writer needing a friend—and I cannot overstress the importance of this—I am much blessed in that regard. That isn’t to say that some friends have not lost faith in me—they have and it hurts—but some very special people I hold in the highest regard have hung in there (somewhat to my amazement at times).

With such close friends, and the support of my readers—and some are both—the friction of a writer’s life becomes of scant consequence.

The combination of writing—and such support—is the joy.

VOR words 2,919.


 

 

Saturday, March 28, 2015

(#176-1) March 28 2015. The consequences of the inconsequential can be magic.

HOW TO SURVIVE STRESS—EVEN IF NOT VERY WELL

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - WEBSITE 1

HAPPINESS IN SMALL THINGS HELPS

Since words are my business, I will freely admit that there is a case to be made for writing “Pleasure in small things,” instead of “Happiness,”—which seems a somewhat excessive consequence of what I am about to describe—but since the positive feelings I get from seemingly insignificant actions, events, and circumstances are so profound, I think I’ll stick with my original choice of words.

I suspect merely being human and alive (it helps) is inherently stressful. I don’t know that for sure because I’m not a mind-reader (Isn’t it amazing that you never really know what another person is thinking?) but the evidence suggests it is a reasonable  proposition regardless of external appearances. To appear calm and relaxed does not necessarily mean you are in that state—though you might think you are. But, most probably it means that you have good control.

Apart from being a writer—a particularly stressful occupation just by itself—I compound the problem by a pattern of tackling issues and projects that , more often than not, are beyond my initial experience and competence, and which take years. Why so? I don’t really know. I clearly have Don Quixote’s genes in me. All I can say is that is my track record—and since I am approaching 71 as I write this, it seems unlikely I will change.

Such an approach to life guarantees a high level of stress so you might think that I have the kind of personality that handles stress well.

I don’t. I am not the calm cool hero figure I would like to be (too many Westerns when I was a child). Instead, I am a highly emotional, sensitive, creative, animal who suffers internally greatly from the vicissitudes of life. I don’t necessarily show it, but such is the case. I wish it were otherwise. I would like to be stronger, more courageous, more resilient. I value my empathetic side from a writing point of view, but, as with imagination, it is also a vulnerability that can—and does—lead to pain.

Overall, I’m certainly not complaining. I value those qualities that enable me to be a better writer more than I can say. But, as with most things in life, there is a trade-off. We humans are an ingenious compromise.

So how do I cope and endure?

Not as well as I would like is the answer—but the truth is that I cope rather better than one might expect (or, I feel, I have any right to).

How so?

  • By writing. Writing is such an antidote to the stresses of life that I’m surprised that Big Pharma hasn’t tried to patent it.
  • By having a writer’s perspective. Writing promotes a strange mixture of involvement and detachment. There is not necessarily a relationship between what I write about and my mood (though writing anything humorous tends to have a positive impact). But writing about the distressing direction of the U.S. right now does not necessarily depress me. Perhaps it should. It’s appalling—but intellectually fascinating.
  • By having a sense of humor. It is a great thing to have a sense of the ridiculous and all that goes with it. I credit my much loved step-father, Alfred, for cultivating this. He was, I think, one of the most intelligent and quick-witted human beings I have ever encountered. His early death was a tragedy. His life, when he was in his prime, was a triumph.
  • Because of the support of friends. This is a complex subject I shall write about some other day.
  • By not escaping into distraction. I used to escape whenever I could into a book, a movie, TV or some other distraction. These days, I stay in the real world much more and live in hopes I shall reach some accommodation with it before leaving it. It may well be a relationship of short duration—a sort of, “Hello/Goodbye.” The jury is still out.
  • Through happiness in small things.

The small things that so sustain me are mostly so small and inconsequential that they seem scarcely worth describing—yet I have noticed that not only do they have a profound effect on my moods, but that I don’t end up taking them for granted. I’m uplifted again and again and again.

Perhaps if I do describe them, the magic will be lost.

Do I believe in magic? Of course I do. Writing is magic.

I’ll have to think about all this.

VOR words 753.