Tuesday, January 6, 2015

(#97-1) January 6 2015. Tale from a Korean War press briefing. Briefer: “Last night, Hill 626 was attacked by a horde of Chinese. It was repulsed.” Journalist: “How many Chinese to a horde?”

THIS KNOWLEDGE THING

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - ENHANCED

BLOOD, SWEAT, TEARS, & FACTS

CRUSHED BY CURIOSITY

“How many Chinese to a horde?” is just about my favorite sentence in the English language. Just thinking about it cheers me up. It appeals vastly to my sense of the ridiculous. I like: “I recognized his shot,” from Catch-22 as well.

I work hard to try and stay well informed—but sometimes I have to laugh at myself, at the sheer futility of what I am trying to do.

True, I try and be selective, and to confine my intellectual curiosity to certain areas (like red-headed women in their thirties, for instance—and I’m talking genuine redheads here). But—even so—trying to keep up is impossible. And then people keep on changing things all the time. The Army used to deploy in divisions. Now—if you are a bad guy—a Brigade Combat Team will speed you to the after life and all those virgins. It must be confusing for the bad guys too.

The solution would seem to be to become a specialist—and focus on one tiny sector and get to know it really well—but I have been a generalist all my life so don’t fancy changing. Firstly, I have found that specialists have a tendency to know zip outside their chosen areas—and, secondly, I like to connect the dots (which you can’t do if you focus on only one dot—like one single pubic hair—from a redhead, needless to say).

When I was small, I didn’t know life would be so confusing. I thought when I grew up, everything would be clear—and like all adults, I would know everything and speak with certainty.

Maybe I would have if I had grown up then—as in shooting up instantly in beanstalk style. However, I took my sweet time over it, and now it’s a lost cause.

Do you know that Buckminster Fuller created the Knowledge Doubling Curve. He noticed that human knowledge doubled approximately every century. By the end of WW II, it doubled every 25 years.

Now, it is doubling every 12 months. Soon it will be doubling every 12 hours.

Stop the world. A joke is a joke, but this is ridiculous.

I want to be small again.

VOR words 371.


 

Monday, January 5, 2015

#96-1) January 5 2015. When I think of MEGAGOLD—a military exercise, by the way, I think of mud, mud, glorious mud! It was like WW I with helicopters.

THOUGHTS ON

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - ENHANCED

WINNING BATTLES VERSUS WINNING WARS

Retired Lt. Gen. Dan Bolger, author of the controversial book "Why We Lost," on MTP yesterday:

"…the reality is the U.S. military is all about winning battles but wars are an act of the entire country. One of the challenges that we have, one of the reasons an accounting of these wars as the President said we fought for more than 13 years is in order, we have to determine what we're doing wrong that's preventing us from winning… the military can give you a quick victory over a conventional army. It cannot deliver a rebuilt country in the place you go. That takes an effort in the entire U.S. population and government and moreover it takes the commitment of the American people for the long-term."

I first met Dan back in 1996 when I was researching the 101st Airborne (Air Assault). They were in the middle of an exercise (MEGAGOLD) and Dan was as busy as hell with the fight. Nonetheless, he took the time to give me an insight into what was going on—and impressed me greatly.

I already knew about him because, apart from being a professional soldier (he has now retired with the three star rank of Lieutenant General) he is also an author and I had read several of his books.

I agree with much of what Dan says—he is a thoughtful, intelligent man—but I think if I was writing about the U.S. Army, I would be a little tougher on some issues.

Hmm.. Now, I think about, I am writing about the Army—right now in fact.

This is going to be an interesting year.

VOR words 278.


 

Sunday, January 4, 2015

(#95-1) January 4 2015. TMD—by which I mean—Too Much Data

THOUGHTS ON MEMORY

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - ENHANCED

I CAN’T REMEMBER A SHOPPING LIST OR TELEPHONE NUMBERS, BUT WHEN IT COMES TO WRITING, I AM TRULY STAGGERED AT HOW MUCH I CAN RECALL

When I was at school I found I was very bad at remembering things by rote—so much so that I was never asked after a while. Years later, I was diagnosed as suffering from a form of dyslexia which meant, in essence, that I have an eclectic memory. That’s a charitable way of describing it.

Writing is not the best activity to chose if you have memory problems. Nonetheless, I was determined to become a writer regardless. More foolish yet, I picked an area where I would have to dredge up numerous facts on demand—the researched action thriller. Later, I added—as part of my non-fiction interests—the economy and military matters. Why so? Well, they interest me. But, all these areas are data heavy and have strained my recall to its limits and beyond.

I have developed all sorts of workarounds to prompt my memory, am obsessed with databases, and normally have a ring-binder open filled with key facts—but when I’m in the zone writing something seems to switch on in my brain and my memory seems to work better.

Damned if I understand it—but it’s wonderful.

Mind you, when I’m not writing…

VOR words 223.


 

.

Saturday, January 3, 2015

(#94-1) January 3 2015. Chop, chop, chop! Onions? No, e-mail!

I TEND TO GIVE YEARS A NAME

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - ENHANCED

2014 WAS MY YEAR OF E-MAIL MADNESS—I’M STARTING 2015 AS THE YEAR OF THE GREAT E-MAIL PRUNE

Much like the Chinese have the ‘Year of The Monkey’ and so on—I like to name years. I’m not too serious about this—and sometimes forget what name I have come up with—but I find it is a handy way of recalling the shape and tone of the year.

I probably should call 2014 The Year of The Fall because I injured myself badly and painfully in April, but since I am now recovered, it is the ridiculous amount of e-mail I have received which has registered most.

I haven’t made any resolutions—which I’m going to reveal—for 2015, but I can report that I have been pruning my incoming e-mail ruthlessly, and seem to be making some progress.

Less is more!

MY SISTER LUCY’S PHOTOGRAPHY GOES FROM STTRENGTH TO STRENGTH. THIS BEAUTIFUL WOMAN IS MY NIECE, FAITH.

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU ALL

VOR words 169


Friday, January 2, 2015

(#93-1) January 2 2015. There was a time when we worried a great deal about the environment. We don’t seem to any more.

I HOLD TO THE VIEW THAT

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - ENHANCED

WE SHOULD LOOK AFTER THIS WORLD OF OURS A GREAT DEAL BETTER THAN WE DO. IT’S A FASCINATING PLACE—AND THE ONLY ONE WE’VE GOT.

I KNOW IT IS ALL THE RAGE—BUT I HAVE NO GREAT DESIRE TO MOVE TO MARS

Smog over Los Angeles, California. (Photo: Steven Buss)

LA SMOG

WE COULD ELIMINATE IT—YET WE DON’T

Most of my higher minded thoughts and behavior can be traced back to my much loved grandmother. I don’t recall my mother expressing any interest in the environment at all. Primarily she was interested in people and their sex lives—particularly as they related to herself—and not much else. The contrast between the two was nothing short of remarkable. About the only things that they both had in common were French governesses and speaking French. As best I can recall, they shared no common interests.

Largely thanks to my grandmother, I have been environmentally aware and concerned most of my life. Funnily enough, it is not a topic that seems to crop up in daily conversation today—except in relation to climate change.  There, the main focus seems to be how climate change relates to wine.

I have more than a passing interest in wine myself.

What I don’t understand is why we are largely content to ignore the environment even though there is an ever growing body of evidence that we are inflicting serious damage on it.

The evil cloud that hovers over LA sums it up a far as I am concerned. It’s a highly visible manifestation of a great deal more we can’t see.

Something evil above us hovers. Disturbing to the point of being downright creepy!

Time for a mug of tea—and to think positive thoughts. It’s an exciting world out there—and I don’t live in LA.

As for Seattle, the sun is shining and the sky is blue.

VOR words 296


Thursday, January 1, 2015

(#92-2) January 1 2015. Does writing beget writing? In my case, it certainly does.

I STARTED BLOGGING MID 2010

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - ENHANCED

BY THE END OF THIS MONTH—JANUARY 2015—I WILL HAVE WRITTEN OVER 1,000

DO THEY SERVE ANY USEFUL PURPOSE? YES, THEY REALLY DO—AND IN WAYS THAT I’M ONLY BEGINNING TO UNDERSTAND.

I started blogging in 2010—primarily to keep in touch with readers and as part of an effort to become familiar with social media.

I pretty much hated blogging at first. It felt like a waste of time and I was just not comfortable with the process. Four and a half years later, I am somewhat staggered to find I have written nearly a 1,000—one as long as 10,000 words. Most have come in at around 700 words—or about two pages. Many have come close to—or exceeded—1,000 words

700,000 words represents a great deal of writing. If you think of a traditional Big Thriller as being 150,000 words long, then you are talking the bones of five such books. In terms of classic literary novels—which are normally shorter at around 100,000 words, then the total equates to seven.

That would be pretty good going even if I hadn’t written anything else—but I have also written two novels, a book-length website  (which has still to be put up) done extensive work on my publishing company (including writing and revising a series of plans)  and have both written and received (especially received) an ungodly number of e-mails. Apart from all that, I have done extensive research every day—focusing primarily on the economy and military matters. And I have also written seven drafts of a screenplay, wasted a great deal of time researching software (ultimately with success), done extensive work on design (though I am not a designer), and lost perhaps six months over the four and half year period through illness and injury.

I have also edited, and extensively re-written, several manuscripts I had written earlier. This, in itself, was a mighty task—but I have learned to love re-writing. 

I rarely cease to function entirely even when I’m ill but my injury really did  throw me because not only had I been severely concussed, but I was in pain. Eventually, I took meds (which I hate) but though they dulled the pain they also dulled my mind.

Am I forgetting anything? Yes, I’m forgetting the time I spent helping to nurse Jo when she was dying of cancer—and the year of death (2011 into January 2012) which followed and which left me feeling pretty shattered emotionally (with adverse physical consequences).

Am I satisfied? Well, I would be a damn fool if I wasn’t impressed with that level of output—truly remarkable given my rather difficult circumstances which included a slow computer and internet connection for much of the time, lack of adequate software, and much else besides—but I also have to face the fact that I haven’t done a number of things which I should have done. The worst is that I haven’t got my new website up—which is pretty unforgivable.

As they used to write on my school reports—even when I was winning prizes left right and center—“Room for improvement.”

Very much the story of my life.

Still, I’m not going to repine today. Instead, I want to comment of the effects of blogging daily—apart from the obvious of keeping in touch with readers, family, and friends

  • It helps me get into the writing zone on demand.
  • It has made writing as normal as breathing.
  • It enables me to write other things—books in particular—with with more facility and authority
  • It has improved my memory.
  • It stimulates thought because—quite deliberately—I don’t plan my blogs. The whole idea is to so discipline my mind so that I dredge up a concept, analyze, develop, and write—in one continuous flows. am I entirely successful? No—I do pause to think—but rarely for long.
  • It has increased my intellectual curiosity (which was considerable to begin with).
  • It is extraordinarily therapeutic.
  • It energizes me.

Frankly, I’m pretty amazed at all this. Yes, there is a downside in that it takes time—and arguably distracts from other priorities—but I’m learning to integrate it into my work routine in such a way that it actually enhances productivity.

Do I now know how to blog? Yes, up to a point—but I don’t see blogging as a formula I have discovered. Instead, it is a window into my mind (which I am still trying very hard to develop).

As far as I am concerned, the hardest part of blogging is writing a short blog. I haven’t mastered that yet.

I intend to—though once I start writing, I find it very hard to stop.

Would I have persevered with blogging if my friend, Tim Roderick, hadn’t cajoled me in his inimitable way?

Possibly not. As I have said elsewhere, no one achieves anything entirely alone.

Happy New Year.

VOR words 805.


 

 

 

 

 

(#92-1) January1, 2015. Consumerism has pushed us towards an instant satisfaction culture. Financialization has made short-termism endemic. I don’t much believe in either. But, there is a great deal I do believe in.

A TRUTH I BELIEVE IN—WORTHWHILE THINGS TAKE LONGER THAN YOU WOULD THINK. BUT HERE IS THE POINT: THEY ARE WORTHWHILE.

SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE, YOU HAVE HAD THE GUTS AND FORTITUDE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

VICTOR - SHOT BY MICK - ENHANCED

STEVE JOBS THOUGHT SO TOO

“Even a small thing takes a few years. To do anything of magnitude takes at least five years, more likely seven or eight.” [1995]

I have read a great deal about Steve Jobs—both good and bad—but don’t recall seeing the above quote before. Yesterday I stumbled across it and it hit me with considerable force. It expresses exactly what I have found and believe in. It is a truth.

It is just as well that I do because I certainly wouldn’t have enjoyed any success as a writer if I hadn’t endured over what many would consider an unreasonable period of time and paid an unreasonable price.

Here, I am reminded of something my former boss, mentor, and friend, Art Damschen,  once said when I was in business and running the UK subsidiary of the Addmaster Corporation.

“Victor,” he remarked, “you are not at your best when being reasonable.”

I was quite taken aback by his observation—as was often the case. Art wasn’t particularly innovative, but he was perceptive, had good judgment, and admired my creativity and originality. He didn’t like it when I lacked the courage of my convictions. He didn’t admire “going along to get along” (to quote an expression common in the Army). He could also be cutting to the point of being cruel. When Art spoke, I paid attention.

Even though it was against his own interests, and those of our company—because I was a valued and appreciated employee at the time—Art encouraged my impossible dream of becoming a writer. Memorably, he gave me a copy of the Jack Hoffenberg book, A Raging Talent.

It was a significant compliment and scarcely a subtle hint. I owe a great deal to Art. He allowed me considerable operational freedom while still keeping adequate control. He was the antithesis of authoritarian but I never doubted his authority. I respected the man. Though I didn’t think of it that way at the time, I loved him.

I met up with him in La Jolla after I had become a Best Selling Author shortly before died. He was as charming, amusing, and cruel as ever. “Victor,” he said. “You’ll never be thin.”

Ironically, Art, a slim good-looking man, who had aged well, had acquired a small pot-belly. I let the remark pass. I thought he was probably right.

As it happens, he was wrong—and dead of a heart attack within months. I miss him.

I admire reasonable, rational people who are willing to compromise, but there is a thin line between reasonableness and spinelessness which you cross at your peril. Yet the the pressure to conform is relentless—and conformity kills creativity.

The main thing I regret—as a consequence of taking the long view (I tend to think of it as ‘thinking strategically’)—is how you lose so much of your base of support.

Here, I am not just talking about supporters in general—but those near and dear to you including close friends and family members, those you loved and depended upon emotionally—those you thought would stay with you through thick and thin.

Some do. Many, sometimes most, don’t. 

People lose not just faith in you, but respect as well. That breaks trust—and trust, once broken, is notoriously hard to re-establish. In fact—except in rare cases—it cannot be re-established. The best that can be done is to regain what we writers like to think of as a ‘level of trust.’

Not the same thing at all—but better than nothing, and the best most of us flawed humans can do.

Why do I take the long view? I can but theorize.

  • When you ask many people what they want out of life, they often say—or write—’fun.’ They want to enjoy themselves. I don’t really think that way. I have a sense of humor and enjoy dinner with friends as much as anyone—but fundamentally I get my satisfaction, and enormous pleasure, from doing. Does that make me a serious person (as the French would say)? It probably does—but not, I hope, a dull one. 
  • I tend to attempt difficult things and rarely succeed first time. That means I am pretty much forced to take the longer view. But, failure is a great teacher, so I tend to improve.Fail enough times and success has a habit of sneaking up on you. Success is pretty sneaky—and can be downright treacherous. I have to wonder why we pursue it so. Struggle is much more reliable. It is pretty much a guaranteed service.
  • I learned to endure both at home and at boarding school. I had no choice in the matter. An unhappy upbringing has its advantages.
  • Reading cultivates a historical perspective. Also, the characters in the books I both read (and write) normally go through hell before succeeding—and, even if they succeed, there is a price. Such is life. It keeps it interesting. Besides, if there was no struggle, what would we write about? You have to learn to see life from the point of view of a writer.
  • My much loved grandmother achieved great things during her life—but they all took time. She didn’t stress this. She thought it was normal—and, thus, so do I. She was heavily involved in social change—and successful—but such change took decades. We talked about all this a great deal, over many years, and I absorbed her ethos.
  • Experience. I have learned that most things take longer than you might expect, but that you can accomplish the near impossible if you stay with it.
  • Struggle can break you, but it can also build character. I would like to improve my character more than just about anything. I think it is the purpose of life.

Many people not only crave social acceptance and the respect of their peers—but need it to the point of dependency. That is very understandable because most of us are conditioned that way by our home environments, our schools, and our institutions. We want to be liked. We prefer to be popular. We certainly don’t want to be excluded.

Deep down, I am as much of an emotional slob as the rest of mankind, but I’m not as people-dependent as most. I don’t need to interact face-to-face with people every day to feel I am a valid human being.

I still need people—but in my own way. Providing I know I can reach out when necessary, I am largely content to work alone—and work is what I love to do. It is my vocation, my passion, my pleasure, and my purpose. And, let me confess, it is also fun.

It is not a party, the bar scene, a football match, or Paris. It is all of these and more—because your only limits are your skill and your imagination.

But do I really work alone? Physically, I do. Emotionally, I don’t. In fact, I don’t think anyone really does anything worthwhile entirely alone—except die (and whether dying is worthwhile is something I have yet to determine).

I’m beginning to appreciate that if writing illuminates the human  condition—which is what I believe—the greatest beneficiary may be the mind of the writer.

Strangely enough, I haven’t thought of it that way before. Writing—to me—is my way of reaching out. But in the process, it appears, you also reach in.

Quelle surprise!

The truth is that the more I write, the more I appreciate the degree to which I am dependent on others—and particularly you, my friends.

Surprisingly enough, I still seem to have quite a few.

Happy New Year to you one and all.

VOR words 1,297.