Wednesday, May 14, 2014

May 14 2014: We writers tend to be a sedentary lot—but the truth is that you write better if you are fitter. Besides, we now know that sitting all day is, in itself, bad for your health. Is thinking?

That's been one of my mantras - focus and simplicity. Simple can be harder than complex: You have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple. But it's worth it in the end because once you get there, you can move mountains.

Steve Jobs


WHEN WORK ISN’T WORK. I love to write so much that I’ll happily spend twelve hours a day working (except that it is not work to me—it is sheer pleasure). However, I have become increasingly concerned about the adverse health effects—so have been giving a great deal of thought as to how to counter them.

EXERCISE MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY. Apparently, exercising alone is not enough—or it’s not enough if you do it in one burst. However, reportedly what does help is getting up and moving around at regular intervals—so I have been successful in building that into my regular routine. Next is to exercise—albeit for short periods—multiple times a day. Will I be able to that?

I’m increasingly beginning to think that I will be able to. Where writing is concerned, I’m becoming increasingly disciplined—and the downside is dire.

THE ALTERNATIVE. Which reminds me: I recently commented that I was freaking out at the prospect of being 70 in just over a week’s time (May 23 2014).  Actually, I’m not freaking out—or even close—but it does make me think. Anyway, my friend, Tim—in his normal witty way—commented: “Think of the alternative.”

He has a point. In fact, given the number of siblings and friends who have died before their time, he has a very good point.

Still, I had to laugh.


Tuesday, May 13, 2014

May 13 2014: American entrepreneurship—like so much else in this awesome country-- is in decline. This, folks, is not good.

“I can honestly say that I have never gone into any business purely to make money. If that is the sole motive then I believe you are better off not doing it. A business has to be involving, it has to be fun, and it has to exercise your creative instincts.”

Richard Branson, Losing My Virginity: How I've Survived, Had Fun, and Made a Fortune Doing Business My Way


REALITY UNAMERICAN. I hate to say this—though I’m going to—but Americans are so well brainwashed (conditioned) into a particular mental image of this Great Country that facing up to reality is considered to be virtually un-American.

FATALISM. It’s a great pity, because we’re not going to change until we see the need for change—and, more to the point—agitate for change. What does agitate mean? It means getting attention by every legal means necessary including million person marches. It means doing a great deal more than we’re doing now (which wouldn’t be hard because currently we seem sunk in a swamp of fatalism). That, by the way, is un-American. We are supposed to be a can-do nation—and once we were.

We were Americans once—and young. And then, starting in the Seventies, the ultra-rich got going and seized back the power they though they had lost as a consequence of the New Deal. In the process, they learned to rig the system in their favor—and, since it worked, they went on rigging it so much that the income of the rest of us started to decline—and it is still declining. No, that’s not fiction. It’s a well document fact.

NOT A DEMOCRACY ANY MORE. The core problem is that our politicians no longer listen to the average American any more. They listen almost exclusively 0nly to those who support them financially. And most of that money comes, in one way or another, from the ultra rich. That makes us a plutocracy. We are supposed to be  a representative democracy—which means those we elect should represent our interests. Clearly, they do not.

Mind you, where reality is concerned, I’m in no position to lecture. I’m so reluctant to face up to reality myself that I write fiction for a living. Where my fiction is concerned, reality is no more or less than what I choose to make it. How cool is that!

JOINER OF DOTS. But, I digress. Actually, I am also a trained economist, researcher, keen observer, analyst, and joiner of dots—and that side of me zeroes in on reality with the zeal of a Sherlock Homes. Confusing? Be glad you are not my subconscious. I am a great believer in the notion that my subconscious does all the work.

MYTHS. Here are just a few of the American myths:

  • The U.S. is the greatest country in the world.
  • The U.S. is the richest county in the world
  • The American Business Model is the best in the world.
  • The U.S. is the most innovative country in the world.
  • The U.S. is the most socially mobile country in the world.
  • The U.S. has the most prosperous middle-class in the world.
  • The U.S. has the best infrastructure in the world.
  • The U.S. has the best healthcare system in the world.
  • The U.S. is the most entrepreneurial country in the world.

Whether the U.S. is the greatest country in the world or not is really a subjective judgment. However, where countries are assessed across a range of criteria, we do not fare well. As for being the richest country in the world, we are—but most of the wealthy is owned by a tiny minority. Where the other headings are concerned, suffice to say that they are myths. Our healthcare system is an overpriced, deeply corrupt, extortion racket.  We pay nearly twice as much for it as other developed nations and yet we get an inferior service,

ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Here, I’m going to focus on entrepreneurship. Sadly it’s in decline. Let me quote from Brookings:

Business dynamism is the process by which firms continually are born, fail, expand, and contract, as some jobs are created, others are destroyed, and others still are turned over. Research has firmly established that this dynamic process is vital to productivity and sustained economic growth. Entrepreneurs play a critical role in this process, and in net job creation.

But recent research shows that dynamism is slowing down. Business churning and new firm formations have been on a persistent decline during the last few decades, and the pace of net job creation has been subdued. This decline has been documented across a broad range of sectors in the U.S. economy, even in high-tech.

Here, the geographic aspects of business dynamism are analyzed. In particular, we look at how these trends have applied to the states and metropolitan areas throughout the United States. In short, we confirm that the previously documented declines in business dynamism in the U.S. overall are a pervasive force throughout the country geographically.

In fact, we show that dynamism has declined in all fifty states and in all but a handful of the more than three hundred and sixty U.S. metropolitan areas during the last three decades. Moreover, the performance of business dynamism across the states and metros has become increasingly similar over time. In other words, the national decline in business dynamism has been a widely shared experience.

While the reasons explaining this decline are still unknown, if it persists, it implies a continuation of slow growth for the indefinite future, unless for equally unknown reasons or by virtue of entrepreneurship enhancing policies (such as liberalized entry of high-skilled immigrants), these trends are reversed.


Monday, May 12, 2014

The time for true gender equality has come. Hell, it’s long overdue. Women are not being fairly treated—and it’s about time women started fighting back and we males did something about it. The current outrageous situation is yet another reason why the U.S. is in decline (and, sad to say, it really is—quite unnecessary).

What would men be without women? Scarce, sir...mighty scarce.”
Mark Twain

“Well, it seems to me that the best relationships - the ones that last - are frequently the ones that are rooted in friendship. You know, one day you look at the person and you see something more than you did the night before. Like a switch has been flicked somewhere. And the person who was just a friend is... suddenly the only person you can ever imagine yourself with.”
Gillian Anderson


HIGH REGARD. I have known a few women I wouldn’t like to meet in a dark alley in my time, but mostly I hold women in high regard and have long been of the opinion that you are a superior sex (and you’re so much nicer to look at).

WOMEN HAVE THE EDGE. Men are better at breaking things and killing people—our traditional role since we lived in caves and wrote dirty pictures on its walls—but women tend to be superior at just about everything else.

FACTS TO BACK THAT UP. That’s not just my opinion. There is plenty of formal research out there to confirm such things as :

  • Women, generally speaking, being less confrontation politically.
  • Women, generally speaking, being superior executives.
  • Companies, where women are directors, being, more profitable.
  • Women being at least as common as men in the military.
  • Women being superior academically.

THE MAIN TROUBLE WITH WOMEN IS THEIR CHOICE OF MEN. The list goes on and on. Ironically, if women have any weaknesses—which, being human, you/they do, it lies in their physical and emotional need for us men which not infrequently causes them to make lousy choices and to tolerate treatment which, by any standards of decency, should be regarded as unacceptable. Here, I am not just talking about sexual infidelity—a separate issue—but about other issues (which we really could and should resolve).

SENATOR WARREN. Let me quote Senator Elizabeth Warren on the matter.

When I was a law professor, I spent years studying why middle class families were going broke. In my academic research on bankruptcy, I uncovered some grim facts:

  • In one year, more women will file for bankruptcy than graduate from college.
  • Having a child is the single best predictor that a woman will end up in financial collapse.
  • Single moms are more likely than any other group to file for bankruptcy – more likely than the elderly, more likely than divorced men, and more likely than people living in poor neighborhoods.
  • Single moms who had been to college are actually 60% more likely to end up bankrupt than their less educated sisters.

Women get hit hard. They still earn, on average, only 77 cents to the dollar that her male colleague earns. Bloomberg analyzed census data to find that women are paid less in 264/265 of major occupations – in 99.6% of jobs, women get paid less than men. Yet Republicans have blocked the Paycheck Fairness Act – a law that would make sure women don't get fired just for asking what the guy down the hall makes.

Minimum wage workers haven't gotten a raise in seven years, and today nearly two-thirds of minimum wage workers are women. Mothers of very young children disproportionately work low-wage jobs in every state in the country. A minimum wage job no longer keeps a mother and baby above the poverty line, yet Republicans continue to block legislation to raise the minimum wage. 

And seniors? Because women make less than men throughout their lifetimes, they receive, on average, more than $4,000 less a year than men in Social Security benefits, yet women rely most heavily on those checks. At a time when Social Security is the only safety net keeping 14 million people out of poverty, Republicans continue to try to cut Social Security for women.

I know how lucky I was to have a woman in my life who was there when I needed her. She's gone now, but the best way I know to honor her memory is to , help another woman – or maybe join with a lot of people and help millions of women.

It's time. It's long past time. Minimum wage. Equal pay. Social Security. Doing something tangible in honor of the women who helped us.

THE NATURE OF POWER. It seems to me that Senator Warren is entirely right—but history shows that people do not give up power unless they are forced to. Doubtless there are a few exceptions, but, for the most part the powerful put  a great deal of effort into ensuring that they remain powerful. They tend not to be overcome with generosity of spirit. In fact, they tend to become greedier and greedier and they will do almost anything, not just to retain their positions, but to become even more powerful. Power is addictive, corrupting, relentless, ruthless, thoughtless—and cruel. Sociopaths just naturally gravitate towards its centers—and sociopaths are not the kind of people you want to be in power. They have charm but no values.

WE MEN ARE IN POWER. But, here is the thing. When it comes to the sexes, we men are in power—and we are behaving in the classic selfish manner of such such people. For instance, we know perfectly well that there is no moral justification for treating women like second class citizens—yet we prefer to maintain the status quo.

LADIES, YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO FIGHT. That leads me to the conclusion that if you women genuinely want gender equality, you are going to have to fight tooth and nail for it. We men are not going to give it to you. You are going to have to take it.

IF THERE REALLY WAS…If there really was gender equality:

  • Productivity would rise because women would be more motivated.
  • Companies would be better run and thus more profitable.
  • The country as a whole would be better run—and Congress would be markedly less confrontational.
  • Millions of women would be removed from poverty.
  • Millions of women would be better paid.
  • Such an increase in purchasing power would increase demand—something we are seriously lacking in right now.
  • Growth would increase.
  • People’s sex lives would improve significantly.
  • There would be less stress all round.
  • There would be less sickness and people would live longer.

WHY ARE WE MEN SO MEAN AND SO DUMB? When you look at it that way, you have to wonder why we men are so mean and so dumb. Hell, better sex would swing it for me any day of the week. But then I happen to really like and respect women.

WHICH MAKES ME WONDER. Which makes me wonder about what other men really think—because surely, if they really did like women, they would do the right thing and implement gender equality NOW!


“A woman is human.
She is not better, wiser, stronger, more intelligent, more creative, or more responsible than a man.
Likewise, she is never less.
Equality is a given.
A woman is human.”

Vera Nazarian, The Perpetual Calendar of Inspiration

I hate to disagree with Vera, because it’s a lovely quote—but as I have said before, I happen to think that women are a little smarter than we males—and they have certainly got more sense.


Sunday, May 11, 2014

May 11 2014: The wonderful and terrifying business of creating a whole new story—working title AMBER.

“There is no greater agony than bearing an untold story inside you.”

Maya Angelou


FORMULA IS THE ENEMY OF CREATIVITY. I don’t think there is any one single good way of coming up with a good story—and I’m glad there isn’t. If there was, we’d all learn it and we’d end up with the blandness of much of TV. Commercial interests are (normally) oriented towards formulae and predictability. Truly creative types value pushing the envelop and unpredictability. GAME OF THRONES is a perfect example of creativity winning out—something which is all too rare. It breaks nearly all the conventions—but it works brilliantly. It’s a remarkably fine TV series.

IN PRAISE OF MINI-SERIES. Incidentally, I have long been of the view that the mini-series is, in many ways, a superior creative format than the 90-120 minute movie. A min-series allows superior story development, allows more time for character development, and permits greater complexity. My top three mini-series: GAME OF THRONES, BAND OF BROTHERS, ROME.

A BOOK IS BORN. Currently, I’ve got an idea for a new book whose working title is AMBER. I have the theme, a great deal of context, some characters,  but no story. Or no story that I’m consciously aware of—which is not quite the same thing. Never underestimate your subconscious. I’m quite excited because I have never written anything like this before—but I have the strongest feeling it could end up being an important book. Through fiction, I intend to deal with a major issue. Is there a real Amber? Yes there is—and I hold her in high regard.

A SENSE OF WONDER. Crafting an original story is wonderful, both because it is such a magnificent creative challenge—and because even you, the author, at the beginning, has little or no idea how how the story will develop—let alone end. If you have 400 pages to fill for the kind of big thriller I like to write, that is quite a marathon. In fact, at times, the prospect can be terrifying, In my case, when I re-read some of my better work, I always think: This isn’t bad—but how did I do this? Surely, I’ll never be able to write this well again. It’s not that I lack confidence in my writing ability. It’s more a sense of wonder that I have been granted this gift—and I never take it for granted.

A STORY STARTS WITH FRAGMENTS. The way I like to work is to have a few pivotal ideas about a story before I start to create it. In the case of GAMES OF THE HANGMAN, they were:

  • A hanged body found in a lonely wood on an island of the West of Ireland.
  • A battle weary soldier turned combat photographer, Hugo Fitzduane, who finds the body.
  • Fitzduane’s sense that it was not a suicide.
  • The small castle he lives in on the island.
  • An elite counter-terrorist unit known as ‘The Rangers.’
  • Fitzduane’s friend, his former commanding officer in the Congo, Shane Kilmara.
  • An investigation in Switzerland by Hugo Fitzduane.
  • A master terrorist who always seems to be one step ahead.
  • A siege of Fitzduane’s castle to end the book.

THE RELEVANCE OF REALITY. Hangman was heavily influenced by the fact that in real life I discovered a freshly hanged body under conditions almost exactly as described in the book. The experience was so surreal that I actually walked past the body for several paces before turning and thinking my life will never be the same again. I was so right. It hasn’t been.

Pretty much everything I write has its roots in actual experiences—which means it’s derivative. Does that mean I’m not creative? I don’t think so. Virtually all stories are derived in some way or other. It’s what you do with your initial ideas that counts—and to make the end result into a compelling story may look easy—but it’s hard (and extraordinarily satisfying).

I love it so.


 

 

Saturday, May 10, 2014

May 10 2014: As distracted and deluded—as most of us are—we seemed to have failed to notice (or have chosen not to notice) that our earning power is in decline. It needn’t be and it shouldn’t be. But it is.

“Experience has shown, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.”

Thomas Jefferson


DECLINING EARNING POWER. When I write about the U.S. economy—which is arguably more often than a thriller writer should—but it’s such fun (well, the writing part it—experiencing it is more of a moveable feast) I regularly point out that the earning power of most Americans is in decline (a solvable problem—but one we don’t seem to be fully aware of—let alone trying to resolve). We don’t notice it as much as we might because:

  • LET’S NOT THINK ABOUT IT. It’s not something most of us want to think about—or even accept.
  • FATALISM. Even if we accept it, we have no idea what to do about it.
  • DISTRACTED BY PROPAGANDA. The American Way of Life is heavily influenced by a constant barrage of political/corporate propaganda dominated by myth, consumerism, and distraction—which acts as something of a reality distortion field.
  • CORPORATE MEDIA CONTROLLED. The mostly corporately owned media—subject to some notable exceptions—don’t cover the economy well. They are not allowed to. There is token criticism, but the scale of our problems is not communicated.
  • WE DON’T KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON ABROAD. The media do a particularly bad job covering foreign news so we don’t realize that we are steadily losing ground compared to many other countries—where in many cases incomes are going up in real terms.
  • POLITICIANS AVOID THE SUBJECT. Politicians don’t like talking about it—and are mostly personally wealthy so are unaffected.
  • UNIONS CRUSHED. The one group, who might have been strong enough to arouse a popular outcry—the unions—have had their credibility undermined and have been largely crushed.
  • ADD A SECOND WORKER AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME MAY GO UP. Many households have compensated by a previously having a non-working homemaker get a job—so the actual household income may have increased.
  • RELIANCE ON DEBT. There has been an increasing reliance on debt.
  • MINIMAL SAVINGS. Saving has become minimal.  People in other countries are saving 10% plus.
  • SOME PRICES DOWN—MANY UP. The prices of many items have come down so although we are poorer, we don’t feel poorer. Unfortunately, the prices of key items like college education have gone up.
  • INFLATION IS MINIMAL—OR IS IT? Official inflation figures—for some time now—have indicated minimal inflation.

MISLEADING GOVERNMENT STATISTICS. The inflation figures are extremely misleading for various technical reasons. However, the most important thing to note is that the Middle Class are being absolutely hammered by:

  • Educational Costs
  • Healthcare Costs
  • Housing  Costs
  • Car Costs
  • Food Costs

In that context, although it is pleasant to be able to buy electronic gadgetry for much less than in the past, it doesn’t remotely compensate for the above.


Friday, May 9, 2014

May 9 2014: What’s the difference between an oligarchy and a plutocracy—and why does it matter to the U.S.?

“The end of democracy and the defeat of the American Revolution will occur when government falls into the hands of lending institutions and moneyed incorporations.”

Thomas Jefferson


Cartoon on Plutocracy

THE POWER OF WORDS. Words matter. They are the basis of almost everything we do—and they certainly anchor our system of government, not to mention every law in the land. And, let me tell you a secret: They are really handy for communication. Without words, I would be writing my thrillers in pictograms. Actually, that might work, now I think about it. In effect, I’d be in the comic business.

NO LONGER A DEMOCRACY. I have long maintained that the U.S. is no longer a democracy—actually a representative democracy if you want to be technical. Certainly, we have the trappings and the theater, but there is plenty of evidence that the rich get listened to—and the rest of us do not. Most recently a major academic study confirmed just that. In effect, the ordinary citizen is not listened to.

THE U.S. IS BOTH AN  OLIGARCHY & A PLUTOCRACY. What the definitions below indicate is that the U.S. is both an oligarchy and a plutocracy—but that the correct term should be plutocracy because there is every evidence that the dominant class consists of the rich.

I rest my case.

IS ANYONE DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT? Well, people like Senator Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Saunders are putting up a good fight, but there is no popular movement taking up the cause. In particular, I fault President Obama for not telling it like it is. He has the Bully Pulpit. He should use it to really rouse the American people. A series of million person marches around the country could have a significant impact—but Obama is just tinkering by focusing on using his executive powers. There is nothing wrong with that, as far as it goes, bit it’s nothing like enough. He needs to rally the nation.

OLIGARCHY

Dictionary.com offers the following definition.

1. a form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique; government by the few.

2. a state or organization so ruled.

3. the persons or class so ruling.

World English Dictionary adds the following.

4. Chiefly ( US ) a small clique of private citizens who exert a strong influence on government

PLUTOCRACY

1 the rule or control of society by the wealthy

2. a state or government characterized by the rule of the wealthy

3.a class that exercises power by virtue of its wealth


 

Thursday, May 1, 2014

May 1 2014: About Interviewing People & Writing. Interviewing Can Be A Remarkably Intense Experience—And Is Always Revealing In More Ways Than You Might Imagine.

Whenever I think of how much pleasure I have interviewing scientists, I remember that they're having the real fun in actually being able to do the science.

Alan Alda


THE INTERVIEW FOR THE MEDIA. If you are in the media, an interview is an end in itself—or close to it. Subject to a certain amount of editing and tweaking—and sometimes a great deal—the interview becomes the product.

WORLD CLASS CELIBRITIES. I did interviews like that in my teens when I was dipping my toe into the world of freelance journalism. Back in those days, I had no idea what you couldn’t or shouldn’t do—and because I was clearly so young and ignorant, much of my more outrageous behavior was tolerated with good grace, and high good humor, by my victims. These included some world class celebrities—in their day—such as Gregory Peck, Vicki Autier, Kenneth Moore, Peggy Lee, Johny Hallyday, Sir Anton Dolin, Carla Fracci, Christina Onassis—and many others of such standing. Many will have been forgotten today but, at the time, for instance, Carla Fracci was the prima ballerina at La Scala, Milan. As for Christina Onassis, she was married to Aristotle Onassis who went on to marry Jackie Kennedy, widow of JFK.

MY ONE AND ONLY QUEEN. My one failure was former Queen Soraya—in Monte Carlo—who was so drop dead gorgeous that I am amazed that I had the nerve to even approach her.

MONTE CARLO. Her reply to my request to talk to her constituted the shortest discussion with an interviewee I have every had, “No,” was the answer—and on she strode in her black bathing suit—all tanned flesh and sexuality, one of the most exciting women I have ever met. The location was Monte Carlo and the encounter took place at Le Beach—which was really a beach club made up of a pool bordered by an array of mostly topless women of stunning beauty, various bars and restaurants, and a strip of actual beach covered with imported sand. Soraya, you will call, had been married to the Shah of Iran. He had divorced her because she couldn’t bear him a son.

THE COMMAND TO WRITE. I was very tempted to stay with journalism (and should have) but adequately paid jobs in the field were rare in those days in Ireland—so I strayed into business. There, I received some excellent training in marketing, and enjoyed some significant commercial success—after some initial failure—but the desire to be creative and to write would not go away. In fact, it eventually became so strong it was almost as if I had been gripped by some alien tractor beam. It was an extraordinarily powerful feeling. People talk about a ‘calling.’ This was more like being commanded. Obeying it was the best decision I have made in my life—and I give thanks that I made it every day. Writing is so satisfying, so challenging, so enriching, and so exciting that it’s the one thing I can never adequately describe. I’m not particularly religious, but if ever there was a gift from God, as far as I am concerned, this is it.

THE QUALITIES YOU NEED TO WRITE. To write really well—and you will never write quite as well as you want—ideally you need quite a number of strengths (if you are me). Few of us are quite as well qualified as we would like—and it is noteworthy that one of my favorite authors, Jane Austen, wrote brilliant work while—on the face of it—living a somewhat circumscribed life. Nonetheless, these include:

  • Experience of life so have something to write about. Here I include the full gamut of emotional experiences—from grief to being in love.
  • To be widely read for the same reason and so that you will have absorbed—not necessarily consciously—how the process works.
  • To have traveled because it really does broaden the mind.
  • To have had adventures—and to be prepared to have more.
  • To know a great deal about a great deal.
  • To have a sense of story.
  • To have an imagination. Almost everything we write is derivative in some way or other (Shaespeare being a perfect example) but it is how you put the elements together than normally makes the difference.
  • To have an original cast of mind.
  • To be observant
  • To be empathetic
  • To have a deep understanding of the human condition.
  • To be intellectually curious.
  • To have considerable interpersonal skills.
  • To be able to draw people out.
  • To be able to make associations where other might not.
  • To understand the techniques that go into writing.
  • To be disciplined in your work—and, in particular—to be pro-active. Most jobs are reactive in that circumstances, colleagues and customers dictate what you do. Where writing is concerned—particularly book-writing—you are normally on your own and no one but you knows whether you are working or not.
  • To be able to withstand solitude.
  • To be able to withstand rejection.
  • To be able to deal with stress generally.
  • To have clarity of mind. It is virtually impossible to write well unless you can think clearly. The world is a complex and constantly evolving place and you have to study it—and then convert your jumble of thoughts into clear, entertaining, and compelling prose.
  • To be decisive. The number of choices you have when writing is truly staggering—particularly where fiction is concerned. If you try and evaluate them all, you’ll crazy—and you will write at the speed of an arthritic snail. Instead, you have to have to make the best choice you can within the limits of your capabilities—and move on. Writing is a decision making process.
  • To develop an inner voice. This is vital—but takes time. It means that, in the final analysis, you will follow your own creative judgment rather than following the advice of the endless flow of people who will try and influence you. This doesn’t mean that you wont listen to advice and criticism—it’s virtually impossible to avoid. But, in the final analysis, you will develop the experience and confidence to decide.

STEEP LEARNING CURVE. Do I possess all these attributes now. Yes, I do—though to what extent it is hard for me judge. However, I certainly did not when I started to try to write. In fact, if I had know how steep the learning curve was, I might have run for cover—if I had been allowed.

CONFIDENCE. What I did have going for me from early on was the confidence that I could interview people and gain a great deal from the experience. Was I formally trained in interviewing? Unfortunately not. However, perhaps because of my emotionally charged upbringing I am extremely sensitive to atmosphere, empathetic, and can normally deduce a great deal from a single interview. Here, I am not just referring to the conversation itself, but the setup of the meeting, the attitude of staff, the bearing of the interviewee—and so on.

EMOTIONALLY INTENSE. My mother used to say I was psychic or had “second sight.” Frankly, I am not sure I believe that, but I am unusually intuitive, and am normally able to read a situation and gain a sense of things with some accuracy. Beyond that, I seem to be able to get people to talk without really knowing how I do it. Partly, it has to do with my genuine interest—which people seem to sense. Another part has to do the emotional intensity I put into the process. When I’m doing an interview, the only person who exists for me is the other—and when an interview is over, I often feel quite drained and need time to get my bearings.

THE ART OF THE SECOND QUESTION. I have one extra attribute that is vastly helpful. I am good at what I tend to think of as “The Art of the Second Question.” That isn’t so common in U.S. media—where there seems to be a tacit understanding that an interviewee shall not be pushed too far—but I come from a different culture where the questioning can be remorseless. That said, I make it a point to be courteous and to keep the tone of my voice friendly.

GIVE A BOOK IN ADVANCE. All in all, I enjoy interviewing greatly and would like to do even more of it. Apart from anything else, it’s a great way to meet people—and it seems to shortcut the getting-to-know-you process. And I should probably add, it works better still if I have supplied one of my books in advance.

SOMETHING DIFFERENT THIS WAY COMES. I do have a new series of interviews planned for a new book—but all I’ll say a this point that both the interviews and the book will be somewhat different (something of an understatement).


TheCenturions_cover

Thumbs upA LIFE-CHANGING EXPERIENCE

Reading THE CENTURIONS was a life changing experience as far as I was concerned. Not only is it an extraordinary novel about the French in Algeria—but it explains more about war than just about any other book I have read.

After completing it, I set off to track down and visit with the French Foreign Legion—quite an adventure.