Friday, September 13, 2013

THE STORY SO FAR: YR2: PART 11: FRIDAY

MARRIED CATHOLIC PRIESTS & NUNS?

COULD THE CHURCH REALLY BE ENTERING THE 21ST CENTURY?

SAY IT AIN’T SO, ARCHBISHOP (the top photo is of Pope Francis)

Pope FrancisThe Archbishop (bottom photo) didn’t deny the possibility – something truly remarkable in itself. Here is an extract from the story from The Thom Hartmann Program that prompted the above headline.

Archbishop Pietro Parolin, seen by most as the second most powerful man in the Vatican behind the Pope, opened the door yesterday in a newspaper interview to the possibility of priests getting married.

He said, “Celibacy is not an institution but look, it is also true that you can discuss (it) because, as you say this is not a dogma, a dogma of the church.”

In other words, priests being single and celibate is not a dogma – an absolute, unbreakable, God-given rule – but, rather, simply a policy of the Catholic Church.

And policies can be changed.

The Catholic Church allowing priests to marry could be a huge step toward a number of positive worldwide revolutions.

Science tells us that the single most significant difference between a country where population is running out of control, versus one where population is stable, is the empowerment of women.

We also know that societies where women have significant political power are less likely to engage in warfare or to have huge imbalances in wealth between the top and the bottom; and more likely to have strong social safety nets, a better quality of life, and less illiteracy and poverty.

It would not be an exaggeration to say that the empowerment of girls and women, through education and political power, is the single most important thing that can be done to save the world.

Do I believe all that? I was brought up a Catholic by monks (pretty good people overall) though am not particularly religious these days. Nonetheless, I think the world would be a better place if priests and nuns were allowed to get married—and divorced. As we all now know, the repression of sexuality can have unfortunate consequences.

I find it hard to imagine married monks (though I knew one who demonstrably fell in love with our house matron). On the other hand, I find it hard to imagine our rigorous sweaty, all male, games oriented, boarding school as co-ed—and now it is.

To be fair, we weren’t sweaty all the time—we had great showers—but only after rugger or military training—or when thinking of the opposite sex.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

THE STORY SO FAR: YR2: PART 10: THURSDAY

THE FASCINATING BUT DISTURBING STORY OF CLOSE AIR SUPPORT—THE SAGA CONTINUES

Americans tend to take this nation’s air dominance for granted—and where freedom from attack by enemy aircraft is concerned—that would seem to be true. Quite where sophisticated air defenses, missiles and UAVs will take us has yet to be determined.

The story of CAS—Close Air Support—is much more complicated and does not reflect well on the Air Force. In fact, as I write, the Air Force is trying to retire the A-10, despite its phenomenal combat record, on the grounds that it doesn’t have the versatility of the frightening expensive F-35. That is code for saying: “We want the F-35 and will do everything necessary to make sure we get it—even if it means retiring perfectly good aircraft and undermining the CAS mission.”

Richard Quesada color photo portrait head and shoulders.jpgSuch behavior is beneath contempt, but entirely consistent with the Air Forces track record in this area. Indeed, Lieutenant General ‘Pete’ Quesada—rightly famous for fostering the closest cooperation between air and ground during WW II—was called a “traitor to the Air Force” by his peers, and forced out of the service.

The Air Force have never wanted the CAS mission and have dodged it whenever possible. Instead, they prefer Interdiction which is based upon the orderly destruction of targets planned well in advance. In contract, true CAS means working with ground forces as one integrated unit—normally at lower heights than the Air Force is traditionally comfortable with.

Yes, CAS is more dangerous and messier—but it is the best friend that ground forces can have, and leverages their combat power more than any other alternative.

Whatever about the  selfishness of the Air Force, DARPA is looking to improve CAS effectiveness.

Raytheon is moving ahead to demonstrate more rapid and accurate close air support after finalizing a contract with the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) to continue the Precision Close Air Support (PCAS) program.

PCAS has been modified to shift the emphasis from automating close air support by enabling ground forces to control the weapons on unmanned aircraft. Instead, the program has been focused on transitioning technology to manned CAS aircraft.

The original plan was to demonstrate unmanned CAS using a Fairchild A-10 converted to optionally piloted mode by Aurora Flight Sciences. Now PCAS will be demonstrated using a manned A-10, says Dave Bossert, Raytheon program manager.

“The fundamental goal is still the same: to decrease the timeline by a factor of 10 from a request for fire to an effect on target — from 60 min. to 6 min. for an A-10 20 nautical miles away,” he says. “And we will still use the A-10, but not optionally manned.”

The modified program comprises two elements. PCAS-Air is the airborne system, providing the interface between the aircraft and the joint terminal attack controller (JTAC) on the ground. PCAS-Ground is the JTAC kit, including Android tablet computer, head-up display and radio.

“The PCAS-Air piece was the A-10. Now it is “Smart Rail” electronics small enough so that anything that can carry the Hellfire missile can be PCAS-Air-enabled,” Bossert says. “We are platform-agnostic, sensor-agnostic and radio-agnostic.”

This DARPA initiative seem likely to be successful, but it’s effectiveness will be limited if the Air Force is not compelled to change its behavior.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

THE STORY SO FAR: YR2: PART 9: WEDNESDAY

TEN FUNDAMENTAL STRENGTHS OF THE U.S. (with qualifications)

Since I was daring enough to list TEN STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS OF THE U.S. a few days ago, I thought it would only be fair to list TEN FUNDAMENTAL STRENGTHS OF THE U.S.

Frankly, it is not as easy because it is human nature to take the good for granted. Still, here is my best shot.

I added the qualifications with reluctance—I don’t like criticizing a nation that I’m really very fond of—but I felt that intellectual honesty would serve a better purpose that jingoism.

What is noteworthy is that we are careless of our strengths. Almost all are under threat—yet, for the most part, we take them for granted. The reality is that even our strengths are fragile—and they need to be nurtured.

THE PHYSICAL U.S.A. I was warned that I would almost certainly be bored while driving across the U.S. from Washington DC to Seattle, WA. In fact, I was fascinated. This is an unbelievably impressive country—well described by the word ‘awesome.’

Unfortunately, the sheer beauty, and striking character of this nation’s landscape, mostly hide the fact that it is heavily polluted and that we are despoiling it in other ways—for instance though monoculture, excessive use of pesticides and herbicides, overuse of our aquifers, contamination of our water in general, fracking, and thoughtless urbanization. In addition the very air we breathe is heavily polluted by coal-fired power stations, industrial plants, traffic, agricultural spraying, and too many other sources to name.

THE PEOPLE: The U.S. boasts an extraordinary diversity of people together with a culture that is, essentially, welcoming and friendly. This isn’t to deny the existence of some disturbing attitudes and prejudices, but more to make point that, overall, Americans come across as pretty decent people who, together, possess a truly impressive range of capabilities across the full range of disciplines, from science to agriculture. 

People are a nation’s primary resource. Yet the tragedy is that the U.S.—though its current business model, and politically—fails to recognize that. In fact, it actively fosters: the decline of the Middle Class; the growth of poverty; the growth of income inequality; lack of equal opportunity; an inadequate K-12 education system; excessive imprisonment; and much that contributes to the growth of insecurity in the average American family. The majority of Americans are now treated more as prey than as our greatest asset and the greatest source of this nation’s potential. In effect, another Civil War is being waged—and this one is between Capital and Labor. It is scarcely an original observation to note that Capital is winning.

THE CONSTITUTION: The Constitution was a flawed document from the beginning—particularly because it perpetuated slavery. Nonetheless it has served these United States extraordinarily well despite the Supreme Court institutionalizing some serious anomalies—such as giving corporations the same rights as people.

Its great weakness if that it is not updated at regular intervals. Life in the 21st century is drastically different to that of the 18th century. In addition, it is tragic to see it being undermined by way of a corrupt Congress, gerrymandering, and a whole series of initiatives whereby the right to vote is being undermined.

INFRASTRUCTURE: The U.S. is served by a vast, complex, downright Byzantine infrastructure consisting of everything from roads to sewers, to ports to our electric grid—all of which speaks well of the foresight of our ancestors, and which we largely take for granted.

Yet it is a well documented and observable fact that we have neglected our infrastructure for decades, and now face an investment of trillions of dollars to bring us up to standard. In addition, there are substantial costs involved when infrastructure is sub-standard. Vehicles wear out faster, there are water leaks, and excessive power is lost in transmission. Overall, the list is long, and the costs considerable.

A CULTURE OF INNOVATION: The U.S. has long fostered a quite extraordinary culture of innovation which has, without question, done a great deal to improve the quality of our lives. Look no further than Google or the aviation industry for examples that validate this statement.

Yet me quote from a Time article on the issue of innovation by Fareed Zakaria, dated June 5, 2011

Even more troubling, there are growing signs that the U.S. no longer has the commanding lead it once did in this area. Two reports from the Boston Consulting Group and the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF) that use hard measures such as spending on research, patents and venture funding as opposed to surveys find that the U.S. ranks not No. 1 but No. 8 and No. 6, respectively. In fact, the ITIF rankings have a category that measures how much a country has improved its innovation capacity from 1999 to 2009, factoring in measures like government funding for basic research, education and corporate-tax policies. Of the 40 countries analyzed, the U.S. came in dead last.

CONVENIENCE: Subject to some exceptions—and if you have money—the U.S. is almost certainly the most convenient country in the world. You can find almost anything here, at the lowest possible price, and have it delivered in the lowest possible time. You can drive or fly most anywhere. Generally speaking, parking is easy. Homes are lavishly equipped with labor saving devices. Educational resources are widely available.

The downside is that there are costs associated with this culture of convenience and instant gratification. These vary from the corruption of core values—greed being one of the winners—to our turning a blind eye to massive pollution.

UNIVERSITIES: America’s universities are uneven in quality, but at their very best, they constitute an invaluable national resource which not only delivers an excellent education, but which fosters ground-breaking research which then leads to the development of some truly remarkable innovations.

The tragedy is not just that we need more universities of such world-class quality, but that third-level education is rapidly becoming unaffordable for many. Also, we are launching such graduates into the workplace already deeply in debt—which has ramifications which ripple through the economy. The most obvious is that consumer demand is reduced. The already indebted tend to be reluctant to commit to further debt for cars, houses, and other components of the material American Dream.

A NATION OF BOOKS ON EVERTHING: The U.S. has extraordinary strengths when it comes to non-fiction books—and the knowledge contained therein. Virtually every aspect of life here is covered is depth by multiple authors, and virtually every problem is resolved therein (other than politically—scarcely a minor reservation). To quote a sentence I use often—it has practically become a mantra for me: “The solutions are out there, if you are prepared to look.”

Unfortunately, there seems to be a near unbridgeable gap between our problem solvers in government, and the vast treasure-trove of data and creative thinking that is available. This situation is exacerbated by the fact that, repeatedly, political dogma is allowed to stand in the way of the logic dictated by the facts available.

CUTTING EDGE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY: The excessive costs and inadequacies of U.S. healthcare are legendary, but even the most ardent healthcare critic would have to admit that, at its very best, U.S. healthcare, and its related technologies, are world class.

 The downside is the overall state of healthcare, which is not only highly variable in quality, but is increasingly becoming unaffordable. It is also clear that in a great many cases, such costs are not justifiable. In effect, our healthcare system—operating largely in secrecy and heavily dependent on restrictive practices—has become a giant system of medical extortion.

MILITARY STRENGTH: The U.S. is currently the dominant military power in the world—by a sizeable margin—and if National Security expenditure is included, we spend more on defense than the rest of the world put together. Most Americans would argue that our being the most powerful nation in the world is a good thing though, unfortunately, are largely unaware of the scale of the expenditure (especially in relation to our other priorities).

Unfortunately, it is highly questionable whether we use our military power to best advantage—and it is certain that our vast expenditure on our military encourages and perpetuates an arms race. Certainly, our involvement in WW II was to our great credit (and economic advantage) but after that, we seem to have opted for a whole series of military adventures where our participation was, arguably, very much against the National Interest. In addition, it is salutary to note that investment in the military is singularly less effective at creating jobs and stimulating economic activity than investing in other areas.

Finally, it is important to understand that the MICC—the Military Industrial Congressional Complex—is a grossly corrupting influence. Essentially, it is a cabal wherein a relatively small group of defense contractors conspire with senior military officers to buy vastly overpriced equipment which Congress authorizes in exchange for both financial support and jobs for their districts (which they use to influence voters to re-elect them). What do the generals and admirals get for their assistance? They get well paid jobs together with share options in some cases. Some 70 percent of generals retire to work for defense contractors. This, needless to say, constitutes blatant conflict of interest. Unfortunately, such conflicts are so common in Washington DC—the home of ‘the revolving door’—that the blatant corruption of the senior military is largely ignored. It comes at a very high price to the American taxpayer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE STORY SO FAR: PART 9: WEDNESDAY

TEN FUNDAMENTAL STRENGTHS OF THE U.S. (with qualifications)

Since I was daring enough to list TEN STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS OF THE U.S. a few days ago, I thought it would only be fair to list TEN FUNDAMENTAL STRENGTHS OF THE U.S.

Frankly, it is not as easy because it is human nature to take the good for granted. Still, here is my best shot.

I added the qualifications with reluctance—I don’t like criticizing a nation that I’m really very fond of—but I felt that intellectual honesty would serve a better purpose that jingoism.

What is noteworthy is that we are careless of our strengths. Almost all are under threat—yet, for the most part, we take them for granted. They need to be nurtured.

THE PHYSICAL U.S.A. I was warned that I would almost certainly be bored while driving across the U.S. from Washington DC to Seattle, WA. In fact, I was fascinated. This is an unbelievably impressive country—well described by the word ‘awesome.’

Unfortunately, the sheer beauty, and striking character of this nation’s landscape, mostly hides the fact that it is heavily polluted and that we are despoiling it in other ways—for instance though monoculture, excessive use of pesticides and herbicides, overuse of our aquifers, contamination of our water in general, fracking, and thoughtless urbanization. In addition the very air we breathe is heavily polluted by coal fired power stations, industrial plants, traffic, agricultural spraying,and too many other sources to name.

THE PEOPLE: The U.S. boasts an extraordinary diversity of people together with a culture that is, essentially, welcoming and friendly. This isn’t to deny the existence of some disturbing attitudes and prejudices, but more to make point that, overall, Americans come across as pretty decent people who, together, possess a truly impressive range of capabilities across the full range of disciplines, from science to agriculture. 

People are a nation’s primary resource. Yet the tragedy is that the U.S.—though its current business model, and politically—fails to recognize that. In fact, it actively fosters: the decline of the Middle Class; the growth of poverty; the growth of income inequality; lack of equal opportunity; an inadequate K-12 education system; excessive imprisonment; and much that contributes to the growth of insecurity in the average American family. The majority of Americans are now treated more as prey than as our greatest asset and the greatest source of this nation’s potential. One direct consequence is stress which may partially explain why Americans, generally speaking, have shorter lifespans than the populations of other developed nations.

THE CONSTITUTION: The Constitution was a flawed document from the beginning—particularly because it perpetuated slavery. Nonetheless it has served these United States extraordinarily well despite the Supreme Court institutionalizing some serious anomalies—such as giving corporations the same rights as people. More recently, it has displayed a strong bias favoring capital over labor.

Its great weakness if that it is not updated at regular intervals. Life in the 21st century is drastically different to that of the 18th century. In addition, it is tragic to see it being undermined by way of a corrupt Congress, gerrymandering, and a whole series of initiatives whereby the right to vote is being undermined.

INFRASTRUCTURE: The U.S. is served by a vast, complex, downright Byzantine infrastructure consisting of everything from roads to sewers, to ports to our electric grid—all of which speaks well of the foresight of our ancestors, and which we largely take for granted.

Yet it is a well documented and observable fact that we have neglected our infrastructure for decades, and now face an investment of trillions of dollars to bring us up to standard. In addition, there are substantial costs involved when infrastructure is sub-standard. Vehicles wear out faster, there are water leaks, and excessive power is lost in transmission—and those are just examples. Overall, the list is long, and the costs considerable.

A CULTURE OF INNOVATION: The U.S. has long fostered a quite extraordinary culture of innovation which has, without question, done a great deal to improve the quality of our lives. Look no further than Google or the aviation industry for examples that validate this statement.

Yet me quote from a Time article on the issue of innovation by Fareed Zakaria, dated June 5, 2011

Even more troubling, there are growing signs that the U.S. no longer has the commanding lead it once did in this area. Two reports from the Boston Consulting Group and the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF) that use hard measures such as spending on research, patents and venture funding as opposed to surveys find that the U.S. ranks not No. 1 but No. 8 and No. 6, respectively. In fact, the ITIF rankings have a category that measures how much a country has improved its innovation capacity from 1999 to 2009, factoring in measures like government funding for basic research, education and corporate-tax policies. Of the 40 countries analyzed, the U.S. came in dead last.

CONVENIENCE: Subject to some exceptions—and if you have money—the U.S. is almost certainly the most convenient country in the world. You can find almost anything here, at the lowest possible price, and have it delivered in the lowest possible time. You can drive or fly most anywhere. Generally speaking, parking is easy. Homes are lavishly equipped with labor saving devices. Educational resources are widely available.

The downside is that there are costs associated with this culture of convenience and instant gratification. These vary from the corruption of core values—greed being one of the winners—to our turning a blind eye to massive pollution. Many of these costs of doing business are not met by those who caused them. They are ‘externalities’ to use the term used by economists. Many are negative.

Air pollution from motor vehicles is an example of a negative externality. The costs of the air pollution for the rest of society is not compensated for by either the producers or users of motorized transport.

UNIVERSITIES: America’s universities are uneven in quality, but at their very best, they constitute an invaluable national resource which not only delivers an excellent education, but which fosters ground-breaking research which then leads to the development of some truly remarkable innovations.

The tragedy is not just that we need more universities of such world-class quality, but that third-level education is rapidly becoming unaffordable for many. Also, we are launching such graduates into the workplace deeply into debt—which has ramifications which ripple through the economy.

 A NATION OF BOOKS ON EVERTHING: Thanks largely to our better universities, the emphasis on research, and the pressure to publish, the U.S. has extraordinary strengths when it comes to non-fiction books. Virtually every aspect of life here is covered is depth by multiple authors, and virtually every problem is resolved therein (other than politically). To quote a sentence I use often: “The solutions are out there if you are prepared to look.”

Unfortunately, there seems to be a gap between our problem solvers in government, and the vast treasure trove of data and creative thinking, that is available. This situation is exacerbated by the fact that, repeatedly, political dogma is allowed to stand in the way of the logic dictated by the facts available.

CUTTING EDGE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY: The excessive costs and inadequacies of U.S. healthcare are legendary, but even the most ardent healthcare critic would have to admit that, at its very best, U.S. healthcare, and its related technologies, are world class.

 The downside is the overall state of healthcare, which is not only highly variable in quality, but is increasingly becoming unaffordable. It is also clear that in a great many cases, such costs are not justifiable. In effect, our healthcare system—operating largely in secrecy and heavily dependent on restrictive practices—has become a giant system of medical extortion.

MILITARY STRENGTH: The U.S. is currently the dominant military power in the world—by a sizeable margin—and if National Security expenditure is included (which it should be), we spend more on defense than the rest of the world put together. Most Americans would argue that our being the most powerful nation in the world is a good thing—though, unfortunately, are largely unaware of the scale and cost effectiveness of the expenditure (especially in relation to our other priorities).

In addition, it is highly questionable whether we use our military power to best advantage—and it is certain that our vast expenditure on our military encourages and perpetuates an arms race. Certainly, our involvement in WW II was to our great credit (and economic advantage) but after that, we seem to have opted for a whole series of military adventures—both great and small—where our participation was, arguably, very much against the National Interest. Further, we have engaged in such prodigiously wasteful activities in defiance of the Constitution. Only Congress has the right to declare war—and the last time it did that was over WW II. Also, it is salutary to note that investment in the military is singularly less effective at creating jobs and stimulating economic activity than investing in other areas. Finally, it is important to understand that the MICC—the Military Industrial Congressional Complex—is a grossly corrupting influence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

THE STORY SO FAR: YR2 PART 8: TUESDAY

LTC VLADIMIR PENIAKOFF DSO, MC—THE MAN THEY CALLED POPSKI

I made reference to POPSKI’S PRIVATE ARMY yesterday, and you probably thought I was joking. Not so. It really did exist, and it was highly effective. Popski (see above photo) wrote a truly fascinating book about the whole business after the war—and then died of a brain tumor in 1951. I have always felt he died happy. His private army was his life’s work.

I have long been of the view that the regular military would be vastly better off if they learned a few lessons from Popski’s experiences. For instance he matched a talent for fast-paced maneuver warfare with formidable firepower—he even came up with a flame-thrower jeep. Sadly, that does not seem to be the case.

The following is an extract from Wiki.

PPA was unusual in that all recruits, including officers, reverted to lowest rank on joining – Private or Lieutenant. The unit was run quite informally: there was no saluting and no drill, officers and men messed together, every man was expected to know what to do and get on with it, and there was only one punishment for failure of any kind: immediate Return To Unit. It was also efficient, having an unusually small HQ.

Three fighting patrols, each of 18 men in six jeeps, and one Tactical HQ patrol of four jeeps were formed and given great autonomy. Each jeep was armed with .50in and .30in machine guns, giving the patrols immense firepower for their size. The men trained hard for amphibious, mountain and parachute operations, demolition and counter-demolition, reconnaissance and intelligence gathering.

They were deployed in many roles, often clandestine, and for several months even operated as regular front line troops, holding a sector of the Allied front line that was badly depleted after the withdrawal of forces for the D-Day landings in Normandy, nipping around in their jeeps to fool the Germans into believing that they were opposed by much larger units.

Several operations used DUKWs or small landing craft called RCLs (manned by 7 Royal Engineerswho inevitably became known as “Popski’s Private Navy”) to sail up the Adriatic and get behind the German front line, chaperoned by the Royal Navy’s Coastal Forces.

Throughout the bitter winter weather and fighting of 1944 and 1945 PPA undertook their operations ahead of regular forces, in support of British, Canadian, Indian and Polish armored, infantry and Commando units. They located targets for the Allied Air Force, chased Germans out of rear-areas, saved bridges, captured many prisoners and guns, and accepted the surrender of the entire German garrison at Chioggia.

At various times PPA worked alongside other secret units such as the LRDG, SAS, No. 1 Special Force (SOE), Phantom, ‘A’ Force and Office of Strategic Services. Along the way they adopted many strays, including Russian, Italian and German POWs, Italian regulars and partisans, both royalist and communist.

Popski was awarded the Distinguished Service Order (DSO) in November 1944, during joint operations (as “Porterforce”) with the 27th Lancers and Italian partisans of the 28th Garibaldi Brigade, to liberate Ravenna, but shortly afterwards lost his left hand to a German rifle-grenade.

Popski’s Private Army finished the war with a flourish: sailing some of their jeeps on RCLs to St. Mark's Square in Venice where they drove round and round just for the hell of it, the only wheeled vehicles ever to have been there. The unit was disbanded four months later on 14 September 1945, after hunting for Himmler, disarming Italian partisans and discouraging Josip Broz Tito’s partisans from encroaching on Austrian and Italian territory.

Monday, September 9, 2013

THE STORY SO FAR: YR2 PART 7: MONDAY

NEW SPECIAL OPERATIONS VEHICLE IS A MEAN-LOOKING BEAST

Special Forces started using such vehicles as long ago as WW II. The British were the primary pioneers through the Long Range Desert Group, the SAS, and such strange units as Popski’s Private Army. Typically, they used converted Chevy trucks or Jeeps.

Such units were highly successful in North Africa, because they could maneuver behind enemy lines and there was plenty of real estate for them to hide in. Few thought they could do as well in more congested environments such as Italy—but some jeep-born units such as Popski’s Private Army did surprisingly well—despite lacking armor and running the constant risk of running into the German defenders.

Their secret was careful reconnaissance, picking their fights, the .50 machine gun, and highly experienced troops who developed a truly uncanny feel for anticipating where the enemy might be. As a consequence, even in Italy, their casualties were kept surprisingly low—much lower than conventional infantry.

I featured a tracked version of such a vehicle in my book, THE DEVIL’S FOOTPRINT. I made mine tracked because my primary requirement was off-road mobility—and tracks generally have the edge in that regard. Though not many people know this, today’s ‘band-tracks’, which are rubber and metal composites—and significantly lighter than traditional tracks--can also go surprisingly fast (60 mph plus). Traditional tracks, by the way, are normally made of steel with rubber pads.

The installation of a rubber band track offers the user a number of significant operational advantages, including a 50 per cent reduction in weight, noise and vibration. According to Soucy International, the vibration level in the M113 has been reduced by almost 70 per cent. The very latest band tracks are made in sections so are easy to repair in case of wear or damage. That mitigates one of the greatest objections to tracks in general.

The above was built by General Dynamics and “plans are to buy about 1,300 GMVs (Ground Mobility Vehicles) to replace SOCOM’s current fleet, which are Humvees specialized for use by commandos. Those vehicles were built by AM General. The acquisition is expected to be completed by September 2020, according to a statement from the Office of the Secretary of Defense announcing the award.”

I monitor this kind of stuff because I’m always looking for interesting gadgetry to feature in a book.

Sunday, September 8, 2013

THE STORY SO FAR: YR2 PART 6: SUNDAY

THE POWER & POTENTIAL OF LINKEDIN

JASHA LEVI

Jasha LeviWhen I was first introduced to LinkedIn by a friend I was still decidedly skeptical of Social Media and could see a future where I spent all day uploading content to Facebook and the like—and getting no serious writing done. Good grief! What a fate!

Well, I’m exaggerating somewhat, but I have remained cautious towards Social Media—despite their importance in book sales—because I am acutely conscious that a writer has just so much creative energy, and believe that such should, primarily, be expended on creative writing.

Still, one should always question one’s biases, and after discovering that blogging actually seemed to help my literary output—essentially by being a constant source of stimulation—I decided I should be more open minded about Social Media, and see if I could reach some kind of constructive accommodation over time.

Initially, Facebook was my focus—though it is scarcely a literary medium—but soon I began to notice that not only was LinkedIn steadily improving, but that it was the source of some extraordinarily interesting people who wanted to hook up.

One of the most intriguing to date approached me last week. His name is Jasha Levi and the following are some extracts from his extraordinary  background. It is singularly impressive.

Humanitarian, Resistance Fighter, Soldier, Lecturer, Editor, Inventor, Author—now that is a life!

Summary

Ran a school for Jewish refugee children from 1941 to 1943 in Asolo, Italy. Lived underground in Rome 1943-44. Fought in Tito's First Armored Division against German troops up the Dalmatian Coast of Yugoslavia from June 1944 to end of war. Taught journalism at the University of Belgrade in 1947 and edited daily center spread of Borba, Belgrade, on the Tito- Stalin rift in 1948. Developed 4-track, half speed cassette recordings used for a quarter of a century by, among others, the Library of Congress, before digital technology took over. Introduced raised line drawings to accompany recorded textbooks (article in Tactile Perception, Cambridge University Press, 1982.)
Working use of Serbo-Croatian, English, some Italian, French, Spanish and Russian.
Specialties:Lecturer on the remarkable humanity of ordinary Italians during the Holocaust, on the battle for the liberation of Dalmatia in the last year of WWII, and other topics.

Most Recently and Currently December 2011 – Present (1 year 10 months)Internet

Founder of The indiePENdents.org

Dedicated to gain access of independent writers to bookstores and libraries by removing the stigma of "lesser books" from all self-published titles. We aim to achieve this through a peer review and issuance of an indiePENdents SEAL based on basic standards followed by three reviewers per title. Membership is open and free. We don't allow any solicitation of goods or services. Full information, a list of current members, a page of self-publishing references and a blog, see the website.

LinkedIn now has my serious attention, but I am still trying to work out how to utilize it to best advantage. My subconscious is working on it. Delegation is the secret of this writing game.