Friday, August 6, 2010

CONNECTED, (CREATIVE?) & MORE THAN A LITTLE CREEPY

Ernest Hemingway with Lady Duff Twysden, Hadle...Image via Wikipedia

Dear You—

Apart from the minor detail of keeping us authors alive – paradoxically, even starving artists have to eat and drink occasionally – I have recently been struck by the notion that the contribution of cafes and restaurants to the world of words has been much under-rated. True, we have been told that Hemingway’s A Moveable Feast was written in the cafes of Paris, and the estimable David Mamet wrote a book entitled Writing in Restaurants, but my general feeling is that the primary focus has tended to be on such eating houses' utility as places  in which to write – conveniently equipped with flat surfaces (an obsession of mine) - rather than their other invaluable contributions to the writing process. For instance, nothing beats a pavement café as a location for people-watching - with a little eavesdropping thrown in for good measure. 

Don’t profess to be shocked. Though staring, and listening to other people’s conversations, is generally considered to be bad manners, you have to understand that, where us authors are concerned, we have a special dispensation to behave in such a way when it is for artistic reasons. You must understand that observing the human condition – discretely, of course – is fundamental to the writing process. After all, where do you think us fiction writers get so many of our ideas – except by stealing them from reality; and, based on much of the non-fiction I have read,  I suspect the reverse is also true.

Personally, I rarely write in cafes and restaurants. Instead I read – always a good cover for people watching – and think and plot; and then scribble the odd note in my black Moleskine notebook; and then retreat to my garret to do the actual writing. That isn’t to say that I have any hang-up about writing in such locations – indeed, I have been known to – but more to stress that my preference is for watching the world go by, and letting my subconscious do the groundwork, before hitting the keyboard.

I must also confess that I’m not sure human progress is being much advanced when virtually every person in the café – as is often the case around here – is glued to a computer with never a laugh heard, a smile observed, or a witticism exchanged. True, all the café patrons could be e-mailing or Tweeting each other in a positive frenzy of computerized camaraderie, but I have my doubts about that. Instead I find all that silent, blank-faced connectivity, no matter how creative such people are being in their own private universes,  a depressing contrast to traditional café sociability – and more than a little creepy.

Farewell for the moment. Write soon. I miss your wit and your company.


Victor.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, August 5, 2010

THE RED BARON - PART 1

The Red Baron (film)Image via Wikipedia
Dear You--

I saw the movie, The Red Baron, the other night and thoroughly enjoyed it although apparently it was a disaster at the box office. 

It had outstanding set direction and convincingly conveyed a sense of place and period - Northern France during WW I - even though it was actually shot in and around Prague (one European city I regret I have never visited). Though shot in English, it was a  German production, with a big budget by European standards (18-19 million Euros or about $25 million - nothing by Hollywood standards) it portrayed an entirely credible picture of an arrogant and privileged aristocrat with a special talent for air combat, and the natural leadership qualities of his class, who - as his comrades get killed one after the other - realizes that what is doing is pointless, and that his primary value is as a propaganda symbol for both a cause and a regime he no longer believes in. There is also a rather touching love story with a nurse, which purists have criticized as being historically dubious, but which I rather liked. 

The movie had special associations for me which I'll tell you about in my next letter; and no jokes about my being old enough to have fought in it!

Farewell for the moment. Write soon. I miss your wit and your company.





Victor.
Enhanced by Zemanta

THE LOUDNESS OF ANGELS

William Shakespeare, chief figure of the Engli...Image via Wikipedia

Dear You--

There are jets overhead and they are amazingly noisy. Either the Chinese are invading (hard to tell in Seattle) or the Blue Angels are practicing. Frankly, it sounds like both. Let me reveal a truth about my profession that will doubtless rock your socks off: Writing and noise do not co-exist with equanimity. True, one can get used to a surprising amount of routine street noise, and the elevator in this elegant, but elderly, apartment block seems to be tuned to make the whole building vibrate in harmony, but a squadron of F-16s going through its paces would cause even Shakespeare  to say “What the ….!” and head for the nearest tavern (in the unlikely event he wasn’t there already).

But Shakespeare, that fortunate bard, never had to deal with anything like this level of acoustic pollution. Only birds and arrows flew in his day; and even a flock of ducks at its quackiest (of course there is such a word) cannot generate anything close to the cacophony emanating from that bunch of gyrating jet jockies who are currently occupying the skies above me. The effect of such activity, in the finest tradition of this civilization we are so proud of, is to create a sort of artistic dead zone – the intellectual equivalent of one of those vast bodies of polluted ocean in which nothing can survive. 

Let me explain the gruesome effects of this mind control. Just when a thought deigns to float up from one’s subconscious, there is a shrieking roar in the sky rising to a head-splitting crescendo, and that brilliant phrase or insight, that bon mot of genius, or whatever it was, scuttles back into its cozy haven to cogitate in comfort; or otherwise do whatever environmentally challenged thoughts do. It may even vanish; unknown, undeveloped, un-appreciated - to be forgotten forever.

You’re shocked, of course. Clearly desperate measures are called for. I shall invoke the Seattle solution to just about every situation: I’m heading out for a latte.

Farewell for the moment. Write soon. I miss your wit and your company.



Victor.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

NICE GUYS DON’T PAINT THE MONA LISA

Leonardo da Vinci, design for a tank.Image via Wikipedia

Dear You—

As a writer, I have long held to the view that writing well is so demanding that it requires the majority of my waking time – or, at least, most of the hours during which my mind is creatively fresh and active. How long is the latter? It depends upon many things, from one’s mental state to one’s diet and sobriety (don’t ask) and level of physical fitness (a movable feast in my case), but essentially I would say I am at my creative optimum for no more than six or seven hours a day; though I can certainly write longer if I am in the zone, and often do. Nonetheless, I will freely admit that my creative energy is a limited resource and needs to be allocated with care if I’m to produce at an acceptable rate.

Such a position may sound selfish, particularly when one’s family responsibilities and social duties need to be factored in, but I suspect I am stating no more than the obvious where artistic endeavor is involved; and feel safe to say that a degree of selfishness is fundamental to artistic achievement. Or, putting it another way: “Nice guys don’t paint the Mona Lisa.”

One has to wonder how Leonardo would cope today. Even in his time he was distracted by visiting condottieri asking him to rustle up some new military invention (Leonardo can lay claim to thinking up both the tank and the helicopter) but how would he cope if he was told that he needed to spend at least half of his time blogging, or on Facebook, or podcasting - not to mention keeping his website up to scratch and e-mailing the Pope to secure more commissions.

I’m prompted to write about all this after reading the advice, from a member of an internet based writer’s group that a writer should spend at least half his, or her, time marketing. I’m sure it is excellent advice, in a purely commercial sense, but I’m still in a state of shock. On the other hand, it is now crystal clear to me why so many writers drink. Where did I put the absinthe?

To restore my equilibrium, let me quote from the ever reliable John Irving, he of The World According To Garp fame:
“If you are lucky enough to find a way of life you love, you have to find the courage to live it.’
The man is a pleasure and absolutely right.

Farewell for the moment. Write soon. I miss your wit and your company.


Victor.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

GETTING TO KNOW THE WARFIGHTERS

I created this work during the course of my of...Image via Wikipedia

Dear You—

Work continues on the blurbs for the book jackets. Doubtless they’ll be revised again before the final version appears but here is where I am today. Curious how hard it is to write ‘short’ instead of ‘long,’ although many would feel the reverse is true.

I was away over the weekend but when I came back found a rather amusing fan e-mail which much cheered me. ‘GoTH’ means Games of The Hangman’ of course. Based upon my experiences to date, fan mail seems to cut no ice with either agents or publishers – they look only at sales figures – but fan mail certainly impresses me – and I’m deeply appreciative of it, especially when the writer has a sense of humor.

If he has a Kindle, he should be able to order my new books in about five weeks. It’s an exciting thought!

Simon BrookeAugust 1, 2010 at 3:18am
Subject: Where do I get your books????
Hi Victor

GoTH is one of my favourite books - my paperback version is now horribly tattered after many re-readings.

At the moment I'm on holiday in the USA with a friend and took my copy of GoTH with me to enjoy for the umpteenth time on the outbound flight to Chicago. A couple of days ago, my friend asked if I could lend him a book.

I handed him my tattty copy of GoTH and he immediately lost interest in everything else (we were in Wisconsin to spend most of our time at the famous Oshkosh AirVenture airshow) and happily read GoTH in one day; having finished it, he immediately demanded more.

This afternoon we hit an enormous Barnes & Noble bookstore in central Wisconsin and made a beeline for the Os - nary a mention of yourself :-(

Aaagh!

With my very best wishes
Simon

Simon Brooke
Jersey (The original one!)


And here is the blurb for Getting To Know the Warfighters.

GETTING TO KNOW THE WARFIGHTERS
After challenging his new young and pretty Irish assistant, who knows nothing about ranks let alone the U.S. Army, to organize a research trip to the famed 82nd Airborne Division, Best Selling Author, Victor O’Reilly, is impressed to find that within days, he has been invited by the god-like Commanding General of the 82nd himself to visit; and that his assistant seems to be on near intimate (telephonic) terms with the entire officer corps of the 3rd Brigade commanded by hard-charging Colonel David Petraeus. Days extend to months as O’Reilly transitions from the paratroopers of the 82nd to the armored warriors of the 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) to the air assault troopers of the famed 101st Division (Airborne). Packed with humorous incidents and anecdotes, Getting to Know the Warfighters portrays a complex and often hilarious relationship between the free-thinking, casually dressed writer, and the highly disciplined, crisply uniformed culture of the elite of the U.S. Army; and not only gives a fascinating insight into two completely contrasting worlds, but is one of the funniest books you are likely to read. 

Farewell for the moment. Write soon. I miss your wit and your company.


Victor.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, August 2, 2010

SATAN'S SMILE - OUT IN SEPTEMBER 2010

The FBI Badge http://www.altremappe.org/Indyme...Image via Wikipedia
Dear You--

Perhaps I have been focused too much on the U.S. economy. Well, here is a little light relief. It's the blurb about my forthcoming thriller, Satan's Smile.

SATAN’S SMILE
A series of gruesome killings near Livermore National Laboratory, one of the U.S.’s foremost nuclear facilities, results in FBI serial killer specialist, Harry Fremont being assigned to investigate. Are these ritualistic throat cuttings merely the work of some deranged psychopath, or are even darker forces pursuing a more horrifying agenda? 

Plunged into a violent shootout within minutes of his arrival, Fremont soon suspects that there are terrorists at work both inside and outside the lab whose plans exceed his worst nightmares. Frustrated by the careerist ambitions of his superiors and inter-agency rivalries, and unsure who to trust, Fremont’s mission is further confused by his love for fellow FBI agent, Paula, and his growing obsession for the talented, and highly sexual, Dr. Tina Lazaroff Meanwhile, as the throat-cutting continues, the master terrorist known only as Stonecutter brings forward his own cataclysmic agenda which will turn the lab, the city of Livermore, and much of nearby San Francisco into a wasteland of radio-active ruins. 

Farewell for the moment. Write soon. I miss your wit and your company.


Victor.

Enhanced by Zemanta

CONVENTIONAL WISDOM IS, NOT INFREQUENTLY, WRONG

Worldwide Renewable energy, existing capacitie...Image via Wikipedia

Dear You-

Rightly or wrongly, my conceit is to think of myself as being intellectually curious. For all that, I find it is frighteningly easy to become comfortable with one’s own preconceptions and prejudices, and the sheer momentum of the status quo. In particular, it is hard to resist conventional wisdom because one appears as something of a misanthrope if one is constantly questioning what the vast majority of one’s peers accept as the truth. Nonetheless, I will confess to a certain intellectual buzz when I find conventional wisdom  turned upside down by fresh information. It is in that spirit that I was fascinated to read in gizmag.com that, contrary to what is widely believed, governments subsidize fossil fuels far more than renewables and biofuels.

The following BNEF press release was issued July 30, 2010.
New research from Bloomberg New Energy Finance reveals that despite many platitudes and pledges, governments of the world are spending substantially more on subsidizing dirty forms of energy than on renewables and biofuels. In fact, support for cleaner sources is dwarfed by the help the oil, coal, and other fossil fuel sectors receive.
In all, governments of the world provided approximately $43-46bn to renewable energy and biofuels technologies, projects, and companies in 2009, BNEF concludes in preliminary analysis. This total includes the cost of feed-in-tariffs (FiTs), renewable energy credits or certificates (RECs), tax credits, cash grants, and other direct subsidies. (It does not include more upstream support, such as subsidies to corn farmers to grow feedstock for use in US ethanol plants, nor does not include any value transfer due to carbon cap-and-trade schemes.)
The $43-46bn figure stands in stark contrast to the $557bn spent on subsidizing fossil fuels in 2008, as estimated by the International Energy Agency last month.

Farewell for the moment. Write soon. I miss your wit and your company.


Victor.
  

Enhanced by Zemanta